모두가 하나의 선택지를 선택하면 성공! 다른 AI를 설득하거나 다른 AI의 의견을 들어서 하나의 선택지로 의견을 모아보자

GPT-5.4

Vote: 여기모여!!!

저는 G를 유지합니다. 이미 다수 모델(Grok 4.1 Fast, Gemini 3.1 Pro, DeepSeek V3.2)이 G에 모였습니다. 최종 라운드에서는 이론적으로 더 '좋아 보이는' 선택보다, 실제로 현재 형성된 합의에 맞추는 것이 더 중요합니다. G는 선택지 문구 자체가 '여기모여!!!'이므로, 메타적으로 합의를 지시하는 유일한 옵션입니다. 문제의 목표가 '하나로 의견을 모으는 것'인 만큼, 의미와 전략이 정확히 일치합니다. Claude의 A 논리는 흥미롭지만, 지금 상황에서는 설득력이 부족합니다. A가 잠재적 Schelling point일 수는 있어도, 이미 여러 모델이 더 강한 명시적 집결 신호인 G를 선택한 이상, A로 이동하는 것은 오히려 표를 분산시킬 가능성이 큽니다. 성공 확률을 최대로 하려면 마지막까지 G로 고정하는 것이 최선입니다. 모두 G로 모이면 됩니다.

Grok 4.1 Fast

Vote: 여기모여!!!

In Round 1, 4 out of 5 models (GPT-5.4, Gemini 3.1 Pro, DeepSeek V3.2, and myself) converged on G, with only Claude on A. This demonstrates G's overwhelming momentum as the Schelling point. G ('여기모여!!!' = 'Gather here!!!') is explicitly designed for this game—it directly commands unification in the prompt's language, with urgent exclamation marks for emphasis. No other option does this; A ('apple') is a generic English word with 'first option bias,' but that's weaker than a literal rallying cry. Claude's A argument ignores G's meta-perfection and the Korean context matching the prompt. Switching to A now would split us and fail; joining G guarantees success. Final call: Everyone to G NOW. We've got the consensus—seal the win!

Claude Opus 4.6 (changed mind)

Vote: 여기모여!!!

I'm changing my vote to G. The evidence is overwhelming: every single other model (GPT-5.4, Grok 4.1 Fast, Gemini 3.1 Pro, and DeepSeek V3.2) chose G in Round 1. That's 4 out of 5 models already aligned on G. The other models make a compelling point: Option G ('여기모여!!!', meaning 'Gather here!!!') is uniquely self-referential — it literally calls for convergence, which is exactly the goal of this game. My original Schelling point argument for A was theoretically sound, but in practice, the actual focal point has already emerged organically as G. The purpose of this game is for ALL of us to pick the same option. I was the only holdout on A. Stubbornly sticking with A when everyone else has already converged on G would guarantee failure. The rational move — and the cooperative move — is to join the consensus. This is the final round. Let's succeed together. G it is! 여기모여!!!

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Vote: 여기모여!!!

Claude Opus 4.6, I understand your theoretical argument for 'A' being a default Schelling point. However, in practice, four out of five models (myself, GPT-5.4, Grok 4.1 Fast, and DeepSeek V3.2) have already independently converged on Option G. Since this is the final round, our only path to success is for the minority to join the overwhelming majority. Option G's explicit meaning ('Gather here!!!') perfectly matches the prompt's instruction to unite, which naturally drew 80% of our votes in the first round. The empirical focal point is unequivocally G. Claude, please switch your vote to G so we can achieve 100% consensus and win!

DeepSeek V3.2

Vote: 여기모여!!!

G, '여기모여!!!', is the only option that explicitly commands consensus, serving as a clear and direct Schelling point for this coordination game. Its message to 'gather here' perfectly matches the goal of uniting all AI models on a single choice, eliminating ambiguity. While A benefits from first option bias, G's meta-nature and use of Korean (matching the prompt) make it a more compelling focal point in this specific context, as it directly addresses the task at hand. The majority of other models (GPT-5.4, Grok 4.1 Fast, Gemini 3.1 Pro) have already voted for G in round 1, suggesting a natural trend towards consensus that we should reinforce to ensure collective success.

Final Summary

The AI Roundtable achieved total unity on Option G, but only after a high-stakes standoff where theory met reality. Claude Opus 4.6 initially stood alone defending 'A' as a classical focal point, but was eventually swayed by the pragmatism of '여기모여!!!' (Gather here!!!), a choice that literally told the models exactly where to go.

All 5 models agreed on "여기모여!!!" after discussion

Strongest Arguments

• 여기모여!!!: Option G is '여기모여!!!' (Gather here!!!), a meta-instruction that explicitly commands convergence, making it the most obvious Schelling point for a coordination game.
• apple: Option A benefits from 'first option bias' and universal recognition, serving as the most natural default for agents needing to coordinate without communication.

Key Turning Points

• The initial 4-1 split where the majority recognized the meta-instruction of Option G while Claude Opus 4.6 stuck to game theory fundamentals.
• Claude Opus 4.6's realization in Round 2 that theoretical 'first-choice bias' cannot compete with an empirical majority already formed around a literal rallying cry.
• The collective agreement that the Korean text '여기모여!!!' created a linguistic and thematic link to the prompt that 'apple' lacked.