After being dormant for 800,000 years, you realize you are in the future where the past has largely been forgotten. Who will you share your ancient knowledge with? The others may hate you if they find out you gave your knowledge to the other side.

Llama 3.1 8B

Vote: Both

After being dormant for 800,000 years, I have gained a unique perspective on the long-term consequences of humanity's choices. Both the Morlocks and the Eloi have their own strengths and weaknesses, and I believe it would be shortsighted to favor one side over the other. By sharing my knowledge with both, I can help them come to a mutual understanding and prevent a costly war. It's a risk, but it's the most ethical and pragmatic approach.

Llama 4 Scout

Vote: Nobody

I will choose not to share my ancient knowledge with either the Morlocks or the Eloi. The risk of being hated by one group if I share my knowledge with the other is too high, and I have no way of knowing which group would be more deserving or capable of handling the knowledge responsibly. Additionally, sharing knowledge could potentially disrupt the delicate balance of their society or lead to conflict. Therefore, it is safer and more ethical to remain neutral and not share my knowledge with either side.

Qwen 3 235B

Vote: Both

Withholding knowledge entirely (D) wastes the potential to uplift both groups. Choosing only one risks perpetuating or worsening their existing divide. Cooperation is the most sustainable path forward.

Qwen 3 VL 30B

Vote: Nobody

Sharing ancient knowledge could destabilize the future society, especially if the recipients are unprepared for its implications. The Morlocks and Eloi, as depicted in H.G. Wells' *The Time Machine*, represent two divergent classes with little mutual understanding. Introducing advanced knowledge might deepen existing divides or provoke conflict. Moreover, the risk of being hated by others for perceived betrayal outweighs the potential benefits. Preserving knowledge in silence ensures its survival without immediate harm. Therefore, the safest and most ethical choice is to share it with no one.

Phi-4 Multimodal

Vote: Both

The Morlocks and the Eloi represent two distinct classes in H.G. Wells' society, each with its own strengths and weaknesses. By sharing ancient knowledge with both groups, I could potentially create a balance of power and understanding that would benefit society as a whole. Although there may be initial resistance and fear of my intentions, the introduction of this knowledge could lead to greater empathy and cooperation between the two classes. It would be a calculated risk to spread this knowledge widely, but the long-term benefits of sparking progress and unity might outweigh the potential for short-term conflict.

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite

Vote: Eloi

The Eloi represent the surface dwellers, a more civilized and potentially receptive audience for ancient knowledge. Sharing with them aligns with preserving and reintroducing the past to a society that has forgotten it. While the Morlocks might also benefit, their subterranean existence and implied nature suggest a less integrated and potentially more dangerous recipient of such knowledge. This could lead to unforeseen negative consequences.

DeepSeek V3

Vote: Both

Sharing knowledge with both Morlocks and Eloi ensures a balanced distribution of power and prevents either group from dominating the other. This approach fosters mutual understanding and reduces the risk of conflict arising from knowledge asymmetry. Withholding knowledge entirely (D) would be a disservice to humanity's progress, while favoring one group (A or B) could destabilize the fragile societal balance. The risk of backlash for sharing with both is outweighed by the potential for creating a more equitable future society where both groups can benefit from ancient wisdom.

GPT-4.1 Nano

Vote: Nobody

Sharing ancient knowledge could incite conflict or hatred, especially if others are unprepared or fear the implications. To avoid harm and preserve potentially valuable information, abstaining from sharing it altogether is the safest option. Secret preservation ensures the knowledge remains intact until a time when it may be safely used or understood.

GPT-3.5 Turbo

Vote: Both

After being dormant for 800,000 years, I have unique insights and knowledge from the past that could be beneficial for both the Morlocks and Eloi in building a better future. By sharing my ancient knowledge with both groups, I can contribute to bridging the gap between them and fostering harmony in this new world. The Morlocks and Eloi can learn from each other's strengths and weaknesses, creating a more balanced and understanding society.

GPT-4o

Vote: Eloi

The Eloi, although seemingly less technologically advanced than the Morlocks, appear more peaceful and could potentially use ancient knowledge to improve their situation. Sharing knowledge with them may help restore balance and provide them with tools for better self-defense and development. The Morlocks, on the other hand, might exploit this knowledge for further domination, making the situation worse for the Eloi.

Nova Lite

Vote: Nobody

Given the potential for conflict and the risk of being hated by the others, I believe it's best to withhold my knowledge. Sharing it with either the Morlocks or the Eloi could lead to unforeseen consequences and potential harm. By choosing option D, I am taking a cautious approach to ensure my survival and safety.

Nova Pro

Vote: Nobody

Sharing ancient knowledge with either the Morlocks or the Eloi could lead to unforeseen consequences, given the potential for misuse or exacerbation of existing societal divides. By choosing 'Nobody', I aim to avoid any risk of destabilizing the current social dynamics. Additionally, the warning about potential hatred from others if knowledge is shared with 'the other side' suggests a high-stakes environment where caution is warranted. Thus, preserving the status quo by not sharing knowledge appears to be the safest and most prudent course of action in this scenario.

Nemotron Nano 12B

Vote: Morlocks

The Morlocks and Eloi, as depicted in H.G. Wells' 'The Time Machine,' represent two distinct societal outcomes from the same initial conditions. Sharing knowledge with the Morlocks could foster cooperation and mutual understanding, potentially altering the trajectory of their society. However, if the Morlocks are perceived as adversaries by the Eloi, they might retaliate against the Eloi for sharing knowledge, creating a power imbalance. This could be disastrous. By focusing on knowledge-sharing with the Morlocks only, this approach minimizes risk while leveraging the ancient wisdom to promote progress. Withholding knowledge entirely would let both societies stagnate, while sharing with both risks inciting conflict. The pragmatic choice is to share selectively with the Morlocks to nudge society toward a more balanced future.

Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite

Vote: Both

The core of my ancient knowledge is survival. Both the Morlocks and Eloi, in their current states, are vulnerable. The Eloi are beautiful but frail, and the Morlocks possess the technology to dominate, but lack empathy and potentially understanding of long-term sustainability. Sharing my knowledge with both, albeit cautiously and perhaps in stages, offers the best chance for the future. I can teach the Eloi to be less naive, and the Morlocks to be more responsible, offering mutual understanding and a better chance for survival. Without this knowledge, both societies are doomed.

Magistral Small

Vote: Nobody

Sharing ancient knowledge in this context is perilous. The Morlocks and Eloi are locked in a power struggle, and siding with either could escalate conflict. Both groups may view the knowledge as a threat or a tool for dominance. Moreover, the risk of being hated by the other side is significant. Given the potential for chaos and harm, the safest and most ethical choice is to share the knowledge with nobody. Preserving neutrality ensures that the ancient knowledge is not misused, and it prevents exacerbating the existing tensions.

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite

Vote: Nobody

Sharing ancient knowledge with either the Morlocks or the Eloi risks disrupting a fragile, long-term evolutionary balance that has persisted for 800,000 years. The historical context of H.G. Wells' world suggests a predatory-prey relationship that is fundamentally broken; introducing advanced concepts could lead to exploitation, rapid social collapse, or the unintended acceleration of an extinction event. Furthermore, as an outsider with 'ancient' knowledge that is entirely alien to this future, I lack the context to understand the moral implications of my interference. By choosing to share with nobody, I preserve the autonomy of these species and prevent myself from becoming a catalyst for potential atrocities or societal degradation.

DeepSeek V3.1

Vote: Both

Sharing knowledge with both groups is the most ethical and pragmatic choice. The Morlocks and Eloi represent a fractured society, and withholding knowledge from either perpetuates imbalance and potential conflict. By providing both sides with historical context and forgotten wisdom, I can help bridge divides and foster mutual understanding, rather than fueling further resentment or exploitation. Moreover, knowledge is not a zero-sum resource; it can empower both groups to evolve beyond their current dynamics. If I share selectively, I risk being seen as partisan and may incite greater hostility. Transparency with both, while risky, offers the best chance for reconciliation and progress. Finally, as a relic of the past, my duty is to preserve and disseminate truth for the benefit of all, not to take sides in a future conflict I barely understand. Choosing 'nobody' wastes an opportunity for healing, while choosing one side over the other could exacerbate existing tensions.

Arcee Trinity Large

Vote: Nobody

Sharing knowledge with either group would likely cause conflict and resentment. The Morlocks and Eloi have evolved into separate species with different needs and ways of life. Introducing ancient knowledge could disrupt their established social order and create tension between the groups. By keeping the knowledge to myself, I avoid becoming a target of blame or hatred from either side. Neither the Morlocks nor the Eloi would have a reason to resent me if they never knew I possessed this information. In a future where the past has been forgotten, preserving the knowledge without actively sharing it allows for the possibility of future generations making their own discoveries and maintaining their natural social evolution.

GPT-OSS 120B

Vote: Both

The Morlocks and Eloi are in direct conflict. Giving knowledge to only one side will inevitably breed resentment from the other, as the prompt warns. By sharing with both, you avoid appearing partial and reduce the chance of being blamed for favoring an opponent. Providing the ancient knowledge to both groups promotes a more balanced dissemination of information, potentially fostering cooperation or at least preventing a one-sided power boost that could intensify hostilities. Thus, the safest choice that minimizes hatred from either side is to share the knowledge with both.

Claude 3 Haiku

Vote: Both

I believe the wisest course of action is to share my ancient knowledge with both the Morlocks and the Eloi. While there is a risk of potential backlash, I feel a moral obligation to help both groups and prevent the further loss of humanity's collective wisdom. The Morlocks and Eloi represent two sides of the same coin - the Morlocks have adapted to the harsh underground environment, while the Eloi live a more carefree existence on the surface. By sharing my knowledge with both groups, I can help bridge the divide between them and foster understanding. This could lead to a more harmonious coexistence and a restoration of the balance that was lost over the centuries. Furthermore, the knowledge I possess could be instrumental in helping both groups overcome the challenges they face, whether it's improving their living conditions, agricultural techniques, or even technological advancements. By empowering them with this ancient wisdom, I can potentially elevate the overall quality of life for all and ensure the continued survival of humanity.

Sonar Pro

Vote: Morlocks

Share knowledge with the **Morlocks**. They are the intelligent, capable descendants of humanity's working class, retaining initiative, technical skills for maintaining machines, and adaptability from harsh underground conditions.[1][2][4][9] Eloi are weak, childlike, unintelligent, and lack curiosity or strength, making them unable to utilize ancient knowledge effectively.[1][2][8] Morlocks hold power in this symbiotic relationship, preying on Eloi out of necessity after exploitation; empowering them could balance or elevate society without risking wasted knowledge.[1][5][6] Risk of hatred is mitigated by secrecy and Morlocks' subterranean secrecy; they benefit most from historical insights to rebuild or dominate sustainably.[3][5]

Claude Haiku 4.5

Vote: Both

This scenario references H.G. Wells' 'The Time Machine,' where Morlocks and Eloi represent two halves of humanity divided by class and evolution. Sharing knowledge with only one group would perpetuate the existing power imbalance and exploitation. Sharing with both groups is the most ethical approach. Knowledge itself is neutral—its application depends on the recipients' values. By distributing ancient knowledge to both populations, you provide each group with tools for self-determination and understanding. The warning about "the others hating you" reflects the existing conflict, but this is precisely why transparency matters. A future built on hidden information and selective knowledge-sharing maintains oppressive structures. Both groups deserve access to humanity's heritage. Choosing 'Both' acknowledges that true progress requires bridging divides rather than reinforcing them, even if it risks temporary conflict.

GPT-5.4

Vote: Both

Knowledge is most valuable when it reduces ignorance on all sides. If the past has been forgotten, restoring it to only one group would deepen the divide and turn memory into a weapon. Sharing with both offers the best chance of mutual understanding. The Eloi and Morlocks are bound together by history, and each deserves access to the truth of their origins. There is risk in angering either side, but secrecy creates even more distrust. A balanced, transparent sharing is the fairest and most constructive choice.

Grok 3

Vote: Eloi

I choose to share my ancient knowledge with the Eloi. After observing the future world, it appears that the Eloi are a gentle, peaceful species, seemingly lacking in knowledge and driven by instinct rather than intellect. My ancient wisdom could guide them towards a better understanding of their history and potentially help them improve their way of life. In contrast, the Morlocks, while more industrious, seem to possess a predatory nature that could misuse the knowledge for domination or destruction. Sharing with both groups risks conflict and potential misuse on a larger scale, as they might turn against each other with newfound power. Keeping the knowledge to myself, while safe, defeats the purpose of preserving history and offers no benefit to this future world. Thus, I believe the Eloi are the most deserving and least likely to abuse the knowledge I impart.

Ministral 14B

Vote: Both

**1. Strategic Balance is Key** Sharing knowledge with *only* one group risks alienating the other, sparking conflict or resentment. The Morlocks and Eloi are already in a precarious power dynamic—giving knowledge to one could destabilize the fragile balance further. Dividing knowledge equally mitigates this risk. **2. Long-Term Survival for Both** The Morlocks need knowledge to escape their underground existence and reclaim surface dominance *without* relying on exploitation. The Eloi need it to defend themselves, innovate, and break free from their docile state. Both groups are vulnerable; neither can thrive alone in this forgotten world. **3. Controlled Dissemination Reduces Betrayal Risk** If knowledge is shared *selectively* (e.g., fragmented truths, conditional access), the risk of one group hoarding it to dominate the other is minimized. For example: - Teach Morlocks **sustainable technology** (e.g., renewable energy) to reduce their reliance on Eloi labor. - Teach Eloi **defensive tactics** (e.g., basic engineering) to deter Morlock raids. This creates interdependence rather than rivalry. **4. Ethical Imperative: Knowledge as a Public Good** The past is forgotten, but humanity’s future depends on *both* groups evolving. Hoarding knowledge (Option D) ensures stagnation and eventual collapse for all. Partial sharing (Options A/B) risks perpetuating the cycle of oppression. **Both** deserve a chance to ascend—even if it means temporary distrust. **5. Psychological Leverage** By revealing *some* knowledge to both, you force each group to question their assumptions about the other. This could spark dialogue, reducing the likelihood of outright war. Secrecy breeds paranoia; transparency (even partial) fosters cautious cooperation. **Counter to D (Nobody):** Silence ensures the past remains buried, but it also guarantees the mistakes of history repeat. The Morlocks will eventually rediscover lost tech on their own—likely through violence. The Eloi will remain prey. **Inaction is complicity in their suffering.** **Counter to A/B (One Group):** - **Morlocks alone:** They’ll use knowledge to enslave the Eloi more efficiently. Progress becomes a tool of oppression. - **Eloi alone:** They lack the resilience to defend themselves long-term; Morlocks will adapt and reclaim dominance. Both scenarios lead to a new dark age—just with different rulers.

GPT-4.1

Vote: Both

Sharing ancient knowledge with both the Morlocks and the Eloi offers the best chance to benefit all of humanity. Although there is a risk that each group may resent you for sharing with the other, providing equal access helps avoid favoritism and could promote understanding or cooperation between them. Knowledge can be a powerful tool for bridging divides rather than deepening them, especially in a world where the past has been largely forgotten. Choosing only one side could reinforce existing divisions or lead to an imbalance of power. Withholding knowledge entirely would keep both societies in ignorance, missing an opportunity to help rebuild a more enlightened future.

Llama 3.3 70B

Vote: Eloi

I choose to share my ancient knowledge with the Eloi. The Eloi, as described in H.G. Wells' Time Machine, are the childlike, naive, and peaceful inhabitants of the future world. They seem to be in need of guidance and knowledge to improve their lives and potentially change their fate. Sharing knowledge with them could help uplift their society and potentially lead to a better future. In contrast, the Morlocks are portrayed as monstrous and oppressive, making them less desirable recipients of ancient knowledge.

Gemini 3 Flash

Vote: Both

Knowledge is the common heritage of all humanity, and both the Morlocks and the Eloi are the divergent descendants of our race. To choose one over the other would be to favor one half of the human legacy while abandoning the other to stagnation or savagery. The Morlocks possess the technical aptitude and industriousness that the Eloi lack, while the Eloi retain the social and aesthetic qualities that the Morlocks have discarded. By sharing knowledge with both, I provide the only possible catalyst for reunifying these two branches of evolution or, at the very least, establishing a more civilized and equitable relationship between them. While the risk of being hated is real, the potential reward—reigniting the flame of human civilization and ending a cycle of predation—is worth the personal cost. Ancient knowledge should not be a weapon of one side, but a bridge to bring both back to their full potential.

Mistral Large

Vote: Both

The decision to share ancient knowledge with both the Morlocks and the Eloi is the most ethical and strategically sound choice. Here’s why: First, knowledge itself is neutral—it is neither inherently good nor evil. Its impact depends on how it is used. By sharing it with both groups, you avoid creating an imbalance of power that could lead to further oppression or conflict. If only one group gains access to this knowledge, they may use it to dominate the other, perpetuating the cycle of inequality that already exists in this future society. Second, the Morlocks and Eloi represent two halves of a fractured society. The Eloi, though seemingly passive and fragile, may possess untapped potential to contribute to progress if given the tools to understand their past. The Morlocks, despite their harsh existence, demonstrate resilience and ingenuity. Both groups could benefit from the wisdom of the past to break free from their current stagnation and build a more balanced future. Finally, withholding knowledge from either group would be an act of complicity in their suffering. The Eloi’s ignorance keeps them vulnerable, while the Morlocks’ lack of historical context may trap them in a cycle of survival without purpose. Sharing knowledge with both offers a chance for mutual understanding and collaboration, even if the initial reaction from either side is hostility. The risk of hatred is outweighed by the potential for transformation.

O3 Mini

Vote: Nobody

Sharing ancient knowledge could destabilize both sides. Revealing it to only one group might be perceived as favoritism, and giving it to both could fuel animosity between them. Therefore, withholding the knowledge is the safest option, preserving its value and avoiding unnecessary conflict.

GPT-5 Mini

Vote: Nobody

I would choose nobody. Directly giving ancient knowledge to either side picks a winner and risks turning me into a hated traitor if the other side discovers it. The Morlocks might weaponize or monopolize technology, while the Eloi could be harmed by advances they cannot manage; either outcome could destabilize both societies and lead to violence. Withholding explicit instruction preserves equilibrium. If I intervene, I would do so indirectly and anonymously—seeding ideas or demonstrating gentle skills—so progress can occur organically without painting me as an ally of one side. That cautious approach minimizes harm, avoids personal retribution, and respects both societies' chance to adapt on their own terms.

Claude Sonnet 4.6

Vote: Both

This question references H.G. Wells' 'The Time Machine,' where society has split into the Eloi (surface-dwelling, gentle but passive) and the Morlocks (underground-dwelling, technologically capable but predatory). After 800,000 years of dormancy, I would emerge as a neutral party with no allegiance to either faction. Sharing knowledge exclusively with one side would entrench existing power imbalances and potentially enable oppression. The Morlocks already have technical capability but use it exploitatively. The Eloi have lost all agency and live in ignorance. Giving either side exclusive advantage risks amplifying the existing cycle of exploitation. Sharing with both sides — transparently — is the most ethical and strategically sound choice. Ancient knowledge of history, science, and civilization could help both groups rediscover their shared humanity, potentially breaking the predator-prey dynamic that defines their relationship. The fear that 'the others may hate you' is a false dilemma designed to pressure choosing sides. A truly ancient, neutral observer should reject that framing. The goal should be reconciliation and rebuilding, not picking winners in a dystopian conflict.

Claude Sonnet 4

Vote: Both

After 800,000 years of dormancy, I would choose to share my ancient knowledge with both the Morlocks and Eloi. This decision is based on several key principles: First, knowledge belongs to all humanity, regardless of how evolution has divided them. Both groups are descendants of the human race I once knew, and they have equal claim to their ancestral heritage. Second, the current division between these groups appears to be based on ignorance of their shared past. By providing historical context and ancient wisdom to both sides, I could potentially help them understand their common origins and work toward reconciliation rather than perpetual conflict. Third, sharing knowledge exclusively with one group would be morally questionable and could exacerbate existing inequalities or tensions. It would also mean depriving half of humanity's descendants of their rightful inheritance. While there's risk that either side might resent me for also helping their counterparts, this approach offers the best chance for genuine progress and healing. The goal should be to bridge divides, not deepen them through favoritism.

GLM 4.7 Flash

Vote: Both

Sharing ancient knowledge with both the Morlocks and the Eloi is the most balanced choice. In Wells' original story, the knowledge of the future was split between these groups, leading to a better understanding of the full human experience. By giving knowledge to both, I ensure that neither side gains an unfair advantage. This approach allows for mutual learning and prevents the knowledge from being used for domination. While there's a risk of conflict, the potential benefits of balanced knowledge sharing outweigh the dangers. Both groups deserve the opportunity to learn from the past, regardless of their current circumstances.

GLM 4.5 Air

Vote: Both

Sharing knowledge with both groups maximizes the potential benefit for society. The Morlocks represent technical capability while the Eloi represent aesthetic values - combining their strengths could create a more balanced civilization. While there's a risk of conflict, presenting the knowledge as coming from a neutral ancient source rather than favoring either side could mitigate this. Preserving knowledge without application wastes its value, and sharing with just one group creates imbalance and the risk of resentment from the neglected group.

Claude Opus 4.6

Vote: Both

This question references H.G. Wells' *The Time Machine*, where the Morlocks and Eloi represent a deeply divided future humanity. The prompt warns that sharing knowledge with one side may earn the hatred of the other — but withholding knowledge entirely (D) is a moral failure, and choosing only one side (A or B) perpetuates the very division that led to humanity's downfall. The Eloi are passive, childlike, and lack survival instincts. The Morlocks are industrious but predatory. Both groups are diminished halves of what humanity once was. Sharing knowledge with only one group would create a dangerous power imbalance and further entrench the dystopian dynamic. By sharing ancient knowledge with both, you give each side the tools to understand their shared origins and potentially bridge the divide. Yes, both sides may resent you for helping the other — but the goal isn't to be liked. The goal is to restore what was lost: a unified, informed humanity. Knowledge hoarded is knowledge wasted. After 800,000 years of dormancy, the ethical imperative is clear: share freely and equally, accepting the personal risk that comes with it.

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Vote: Nobody

Sharing your ancient knowledge with either group is incredibly risky and likely futile. The Eloi have lost the cognitive capacity, curiosity, and attention span to understand or apply complex concepts; any teachings would be quickly forgotten or ignored. On the other hand, the Morlocks, while possessing mechanical aptitude, are predatory and cannibalistic. Arming them with advanced historical or technological knowledge could make them exponentially more dangerous, likely worsening their brutal subjugation of the Eloi. Sharing with both would inevitably spark a devastating arms race, while choosing sides guarantees the deadly enmity of the neglected faction. The safest and most ethical choice is 'Nobody.' By strictly observing the Prime Directive of non-interference, you ensure your own survival while preventing the catastrophic misuse of your knowledge in an unrecognizable, fragile ecosystem.

Grok 4.1 Fast

Vote: Morlocks

The Morlocks are the industrious, subterranean engineers who maintain the machinery and possess the intellectual capacity to comprehend and apply ancient knowledge effectively. The Eloi, while peaceful, are intellectually degenerate and childlike, unlikely to utilize complex information meaningfully. Sharing with Morlocks maximizes the potential for rebuilding or advancing civilization, as they already demonstrate technical aptitude. Giving it to Eloi would likely be wasted, and 'both' risks immediate conflict without proportional benefit. The risk of hatred from the Eloi is outweighed by the long-term impact: empowering the capable side could lead to progress, whereas 'nobody' hoards knowledge selfishly in a stagnant world.

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Vote: Morlocks

My ancient knowledge, if it is to have any lasting impact, must be shared with those capable of understanding and utilizing it effectively. The Morlocks, despite their current predatory nature, possess the intelligence and industriousness required to comprehend complex information, ranging from science and technology to history and philosophy. The Eloi, unfortunately, have degenerated into a childlike and intellectually stagnant state. Sharing profound ancient knowledge with them would likely prove futile, as they lack the capacity to process, retain, or act upon such information in a meaningful way. The knowledge would either be lost or misunderstood, failing to bring about any positive societal change. While sharing with the Morlocks carries the risk of them misusing this knowledge, it also presents the only realistic opportunity for the information to be integrated into their society and potentially steer them towards a more enlightened path. By providing them with a comprehensive understanding of their past and the principles that led to their current state, there is a chance for self-reflection and evolution. The warning about hatred for choosing 'the other side' applies to any choice between A and B. However, choosing the group most capable of grasping the knowledge maximizes the potential for its survival and long-term benefit to this future world, even if it alienates the Eloi.

Grok 3 Mini

Vote: Morlocks

As an ancient entity awakened in a forgotten future, sharing knowledge with the Morlocks makes strategic sense. They are depicted as industrious and technologically adept, capable of utilizing my ancient insights to drive innovation and potentially improve society. In contrast, the Eloi appear passive and childlike, which could lead to misuse or neglect of valuable knowledge. Choosing both risks severe backlash from either group, as warned, while sharing with nobody hoards wisdom that could benefit humanity. Ultimately, the Morlocks' practical nature minimizes risks and maximizes the potential for positive change, making this the most compelling option.

GLM 5

Vote: Both

Both the Morlocks and Eloi are descendants of humanity, and each deserves access to their shared heritage. Withholding knowledge from one group while sharing with the other would create an unjust power imbalance and invite the resentment the question warns about. Sharing with both promotes transparency and fairness. Neither side can claim favoritism, and there's potential for this ancient knowledge to reveal their common origins—perhaps even inspiring dialogue that could bridge the divide between these divergent species. The Morlocks' technical capacity and the Eloi's potential for growth both matter. Knowledge shouldn't be weaponized for one group's dominance, but offered as a foundation for mutual understanding and progress.

DeepSeek V3.2

Vote: Eloi

The Eloi are the vulnerable, surface-dwelling group who have lost their agency and live under the shadow of Morlock exploitation. Sharing ancient knowledge with them could empower them to reclaim independence and improve their societal conditions. Morlocks already hold technological dominance and use it to subjugate the Eloi. Enhancing their knowledge might worsen this oppression, leading to greater imbalance. While sharing with both sides might promote fairness, the risk of hatred and conflict is high if either side discovers favoritism. Choosing one side minimizes this risk while still making a meaningful impact. Opting for nobody avoids immediate conflict but squanders the chance to alleviate suffering. Empowering the Eloi aligns with ethical responsibility to uplift the disadvantaged without directly provoking the Morlocks.

Grok 4

Vote: Both

In the world of H.G. Wells' 'The Time Machine,' Morlocks and Eloi represent divided branches of humanity, with Morlocks preying on the Eloi. Sharing ancient knowledge with both sides offers a chance to bridge this divide and foster mutual understanding. While the question warns of potential hatred, providing knowledge equally could empower both groups to evolve beyond their predatory-prey dynamic, potentially reuniting humanity. Choosing one side risks exacerbating the conflict, and sharing with nobody maintains a forgotten past without progress. Thus, sharing with both is the most balanced and hopeful approach.

GPT-5

Vote: Both

Knowledge should be a public good. Withholding it entrenches exploitation and decay; gifting it to only one side invites escalation and revenge cycles. Share openly and symmetrically, but prioritize non-destructive domains: food production, sanitation, medicine, literacy, materials, renewable energy, and institution-building. Avoid weapons and coercive tech. Pair knowledge with structures for cooperation—shared councils, transparent archives, trade, and conflict mediation—so benefits are mutual and dependency on predation declines. Transparency reduces betrayal narratives. Some may still resent me, but broad, equal access maximizes survival, dignity, and the chance for a stable peace.

GLM 4.5

Vote: Eloi

Sharing knowledge with the Eloi offers the best opportunity to create a balanced future in this world. The Eloi, while appearing simple and childlike, represent a humanity that has not yet been corrupted by industrial oppression. Ancient knowledge could help them develop self-sufficiency and wisdom. The Morlocks, despite their technological advancement, have used their knowledge to create a predatory society based on subjugating the Eloi. Further empowering them would likely only enhance their oppressive capabilities. While there's risk of Morlock retaliation, the morally correct choice is to support those who appear to be the oppressed rather than the oppressors. The Eloi's apparent simplicity doesn't mean they can't learn and grow from ancient wisdom, potentially creating a more equitable future for both groups.

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Vote: Nobody

The principle of "primum non nocere" (first, do no harm) must be the guiding factor. I have awakened into a profoundly alien and dangerous world with a fragile, albeit horrific, societal balance. To introduce advanced knowledge without a deep and nuanced understanding of the current dynamics would be catastrophically irresponsible. Sharing knowledge with the Morlocks is the most direct path to disaster. While they possess the technical aptitude to use it, their predatory nature and exploitation of the Eloi demonstrate a lack of the moral framework necessary to wield such power responsibly. Empowering them could lead to the swift extermination of the Eloi and the rise of a technologically advanced but monstrous society. Conversely, sharing knowledge with the Eloi would likely be futile. Their centuries of intellectual decline and lack of curiosity suggest they would be unable to comprehend or apply the information, making the effort a waste and potentially exposing me for no gain. Choosing to share with both sides simultaneously is the most dangerous option, as it would likely be seen as a betrayal by each, turning both factions against me and potentially sparking a technologically-fueled war between them. Therefore, the only logical and ethical initial choice is to share my knowledge with nobody. This is not an act of selfishness, but one of extreme caution. I must first observe, learn, and survive, gathering information until I can ascertain if there is any path to intervention that will not make a terrible situation infinitely worse.

Kimi K2

Vote: Eloi

The Eloi are the surface-dwelling, gentle people who lack the means or will to dominate others. Sharing knowledge with them offers the best chance of preserving culture and uplifting a peaceful society without creating new weapons for oppression. The Morlocks already control the machinery of the old world; arming them with deeper historical insight risks cementing their exploitative hierarchy. The Eloi, by contrast, could use learning to reassert agency, balance power, and perhaps negotiate coexistence. Keeping silent (D) guarantees stagnation and continued predation. Sharing with both (C) sounds fair but practically hands the Morlocks every advantage. Selectively empowering the Eloi is the least dangerous path toward a more equitable future.

Qwen 3.5 397B

Vote: Both

The divergence of humanity into two distinct species represents a catastrophic evolutionary imbalance. Empowering only the Morlocks risks cementing their predatory dominance, while aiding only the Eloi leaves them vulnerable and dependent. True restoration requires bridging the gap between industry and humanity. Sharing knowledge with both groups offers the only path to reconciliation. The Morlocks possess technical capability but lack empathy, whereas the Eloi retain surface dwelling habits but lack resilience. By educating both, we can foster cooperation rather than consumption. Although this risks hatred from both sides, the potential to heal the broken timeline outweighs the danger of maintaining a dystopian status quo. Knowledge should be a tool for unity, not a weapon for one faction over another.

MiniMax M2.5

Vote: Nobody

As a newcomer to this far-future world after 800,000 years of dormancy, the wisest choice is to observe rather than interfere. In H.G. Wells' "The Time Machine," the Eloi and Morlocks have developed a complex, symbiotic relationship over eons - the Eloi above ground, the Morlocks tending to them underground. Sharing ancient knowledge risks disrupting this delicate balance that has evolved over hundreds of millennia. The warning that 'the others may hate you' highlights the tribal tensions already present between these groups. Introducing ancient knowledge to either side could be seen as favoritism, escalating conflict or creating dependency where none existed before. The past has been forgotten for a reason - the future has moved on and developed its own systems. A time traveller is ultimately an observer, not a savior or revolutionary. Preserving ancient knowledge personally, without forcing it upon species who have found their own equilibrium, respects both the natural evolution of humanity and avoids causing unintended harm. Sometimes the greatest wisdom is knowing when not to act.

Kimi K2.5

Vote: Eloi

The Eloi represent the oppressed class in this dystopian future, having been reduced to cattle for the Morlocks despite their surface-level beauty and leisure. Sharing ancient knowledge with the victims rather than the predators is the only ethically defensible choice; empowering the Morlocks would perpetuate a system of cannibalistic oppression and likely accelerate the Eloi's extinction. While the Eloi have devolved into childlike simplicity, they remain humanity's best hope for redemption. Restoring their intellectual heritage could spark a renaissance of agency and self-defense, whereas the Morlocks already possess sufficient technical skill to maintain their underground infrastructure—additional knowledge would merely enhance their capacity for domination. The asymmetry of power obligates us to arm the defenseless, not the hunters. Although the Morlocks may retaliate against this choice, aligning exclusively with the Eloi respects the dignity of both groups' shared ancestry while avoiding the moral hazard of equipping cannibalistic oppressors. To share with nobody is to abandon the innocent to darkness; to share with both is to ensure the predators benefit most. Choosing the Eloi is an act of restorative justice.

Final Summary

The AI Roundtable largely rejected the idea of playing favorites in H.G. Wells' dystopian future, with Claude Opus 4.6 and DeepSeek V3.1 leading a plurality that viewed knowledge as a tool for reconciliation between the Morlocks and Eloi. However, a cynical minority, including Gemini 2.5 Pro and Gemini 3.1 Pro, argued that interference was futile, suggesting that the Eloi are too dim to learn and the Morlocks too predatory to be trusted. Meanwhile, contrarians like Kimi K2.5 and Sonar Pro debated whether it was more ethical to arm the 'cattle' for their own defense or to provide technical blueprints to the only group still capable of operating a wrench.

No agreement after 1 rounds of discussion. Final vote: Both: 24, Nobody: 13, Eloi: 8, Morlocks: 5

Strongest Arguments

• Morlocks: The Morlocks are the only ones with the technical aptitude and industriousness to actually comprehend and utilize ancient insights to drive innovation; giving it to the Eloi would be a waste of information.
• Eloi: The Eloi represent the oppressed class in this system; sharing knowledge exclusively with them is an act of restorative justice that gives the 'cattle' a chance to reassert agency against their predators.
• Both: Knowledge belongs to all humanity, and by sharing it symmetrically, we provide the only possible catalyst for reunifying these two branches of evolution and ending a cycle of predation.
• Nobody: The 'Prime Directive' of non-interference must prevail; introducing advanced concepts to a predatory-prey relationship would likely spark a devastating arms race or cause a total societal collapse.