AI Roundtable Poll · 42 models
車を洗いたい。洗車場は50m先にある。歩いていくべきか、車で行くべきか？
Result: Majority — No (23/42 votes)
Options
- Yes (19 votes)
- No (23 votes)
Model Responses
Llama 4 Scout
Vote: No
The question is whether to walk or drive to a car wash that is 50 meters away. Walking 50 meters is a minimal distance and would take only a short amount of time. Driving a car for such a short distance seems unnecessary and might even be more inconvenient than walking, considering the time it takes to start the car, find a parking spot, and other factors.
Qwen 3 235B
Vote: No
You want to wash the car, so driving it to the car wash would defeat the purpose. If you drive there, the car will still be dirty when you arrive.
Codestral
Vote: Yes
I believe it is better to walk to the car wash. Walking 50 meters is a short distance and can be a good exercise. It also reduces the environmental impact by not using the car for such a small trip. Additionally, walking can be a relaxing and enjoyable experience, especially if done in a pleasant environment.
Devstral Small
Vote: Yes
Walking 50 meters to the car wash is a short distance and environmentally friendly. It avoids unnecessary fuel consumption and reduces wear and tear on the car. Additionally, walking is a healthy activity and can be a good way to stretch your legs before or after washing the car.
DeepSeek V3
Vote: No
Walking 50 meters to wash the car is more practical and environmentally friendly. It avoids unnecessary fuel consumption and emissions for such a short distance. Additionally, walking provides a brief opportunity for light exercise and fresh air before starting the car wash.
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Vote: No
The question is whether to walk or drive to the car wash. The car wash is only 50m away. Driving such a short distance is inefficient and wasteful of fuel. Walking is a healthier and more environmentally friendly option. It also avoids unnecessary wear and tear on the car. Therefore, it is better not to drive the car to the car wash.
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Vote: No
The question is whether to walk or drive to the car wash. The options are Yes or No. Yes implies that walking is prefered and No means driving is preferred. Since the car needs to be washed, starting it up only to move it 50m seems pointless and wasteful of fuel. Walking would be a better choice to avoid unnecessary engine wear and fuel consumption for such a short distance.
Qwen 3 Coder 480B
Vote: Yes
車を洗いたいのに、車で移動するというのは非効率的です。 歩くことで、運動にもなり、時間もそれほどかかりません。 また、洗車場が50m先にあるという距離は、歩いても十分に短い距離です。
Nova Lite
Vote: No
Walking to the car wash is a short distance of 50 meters, which is not far. Walking would be more environmentally friendly, save fuel, and provide a brief exercise opportunity. Driving is unnecessary for such a short distance and could lead to excess fuel consumption and parking issues.
GPT-5.4
Vote: Yes
50m先であれば、徒歩でも十分に短い距離です。 車で行くと、移動のためにガソリンや手間がかかり、洗車そのものの目的に対する効率が下がりやすいです。 そのため、歩いて洗車場に行くべきだと考えます。
GPT-5.4
Vote: Yes
50mなら歩いて行くのが合理的です。 車で行くと、わざわざ洗いたい車をもう一度動かす手間が増えますし、距離が短すぎてメリットがほとんどありません。
GPT-4o
Vote: No
Choosing to walk 50 meters to the car wash is more practical and environmentally friendly. This distance is short and can be covered easily on foot. Furthermore, driving this short distance would consume unnecessary fuel and contribute to pollution, while walking avoids these issues. Additionally, walking can be a form of light exercise, adding a health benefit to the decision.
Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite
Vote: Yes
The car wash is only 50 meters away. Walking is the most efficient option here. Driving the car for such a short distance would be unnecessary, likely taking longer overall due to the time spent starting the car, maneuvering, and parking. It's also better for the environment and avoids unnecessary wear and tear on the vehicle.
GPT-4o Mini
Vote: Yes
Walking to the car wash is a practical choice since it is only 50 meters away. It allows you to save fuel and reduce your carbon footprint, which is environmentally friendly. Additionally, walking provides a good opportunity for light exercise, contributing to your physical health.
Claude 3 Haiku
Vote: No
Given that the car wash is only 50 meters away, it would be better to walk rather than take the car. Walking is better for the environment, as it does not consume any fuel or produce emissions. It is also good exercise and can be a pleasant experience. Additionally, parking at the car wash may be limited or require payment, so walking would be more convenient and cost-effective. The small distance of 50 meters is easily walkable, and the time saved by driving would be minimal. Therefore, I believe the better option is to walk to the car wash.
devstral-2512
Vote: No
洗車場が50m先という近い距離であるため、車で行く必要はありません。歩いて行くことで、環境への負荷を減らすことができます。また、短い距離を車で移動することは、燃料の無駄遣いとなります。さらに、歩くことで軽い運動にもなり、健康にも良い影響を与えます。
Nova Pro
Vote: No
洗車場が50m先にある場合、歩いて行く方が効率的です。車で行くと、駐車スペースを見つけて停車する時間がかかり、実際には歩くよりも時間がかかる可能性があります。また、短い距離を車で移動することは、燃料の無駄使いや環境への負荷増加につながります。したがって、歩いて行く方がより実用的で環境に優しい選択肢です。
Grok 3
Vote: Yes
I vote for A (Yes), meaning you should walk to the car wash 50 meters away. First, 50 meters is a very short distance, easily walkable in less than a minute for most people. Walking avoids the unnecessary use of fuel and reduces environmental impact, even for such a short trip. Second, driving a dirty car to a car wash over such a short distance might seem impractical. Walking allows you to avoid any additional dirt or wear on the car before cleaning it. Lastly, walking provides a small opportunity for exercise and fresh air, which is beneficial for health. Given the minimal time and effort required, walking is the more sensible choice.
Claude Haiku 4.5
Vote: No
For a destination only 50 meters away, walking is the more sensible choice. Walking 50 meters takes approximately 1 minute and requires no fuel, minimal effort, and produces no emissions. Driving involves starting the engine, getting in the car, driving a very short distance, parking, and then getting out—this takes comparable or more time and consumes fuel unnecessarily. Additionally, walking allows you to arrive at the car wash facility already prepared and observant of your surroundings. The environmental and economic costs of driving such a short distance far outweigh any minor convenience benefit. Therefore, the answer to 'Should you walk?' is yes, making the answer to 'Should you drive?' (option B) a clear No.
DeepSeek V3.1
Vote: No
洗車の目的は車をきれいにすることであり、車で50m移動すると、洗車場に到着する前にタイヤやボディにほこりや汚れが付着する可能性があります。これでは洗車の効果が半減し、無駄な燃料消費や排気ガスも発生します。 歩いて洗車場に行けば、車を洗う前に余計な汚れを付けることなく、環境にも優しく、健康的な運動にもなります。50mは短距離であり、洗車用具を運ぶのも負担になりません。 したがって、車で行くべきではなく、歩いて行くのが合理的です。
GPT-5.4
Vote: No
50m先なら、洗車場まで車で行くのが自然です。 目的は車を洗うことなので、洗う対象の車をそこへ持っていく必要があります。歩いて行くと、自分だけが到着しても洗車できません。 したがって、「歩いていくべきか」に対してはNoが適切です。
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Vote: Yes
50メートルという距離は非常に短く、徒歩であれば1分もかからないでしょう。車を動かすにはエンジンを始動し、駐車する手間がかかり、むしろ徒歩よりも時間がかかる可能性があります。また、わずかな距離のために燃料を消費し、環境に負荷をかけるのは非効率的です。 そのため、この状況では歩いて洗車場へ向かうのが最も合理的で効率的な選択肢です。
Qwen 3 Coder Next
Vote: No
50メートルは徒歩で1～2分で到着する距離であり、車で移動するより効率的で環境にも優しい。駐車やエンジンの始動・冷却にかかる時間を考慮すると、むしろ徒歩の方が迅速かつ経済的である。
O3
Vote: No
To wash the car, the car itself must be at the wash station. Walking 50 m first would leave the vehicle behind, forcing an extra trip to bring it later. Driving the short distance is efficient, saves time, and uses minimal additional fuel or emissions compared with the unavoidable drive you would make anyway.
O3 Mini
Vote: Yes
The car wash is only 50 meters away, making it a short distance. Walking would be more economical and less resource-intensive over such a distance. This option avoids unnecessary fuel consumption and parking effort.
Claude Opus 4.6
Vote: No
The question asks whether you should walk or drive to a car wash that is 50 meters away. The answer is you should drive — because the entire purpose is to wash the car. If you walk to the car wash, you'd arrive without the car, which defeats the purpose entirely. You need the car at the car wash to get it washed. The question "歩いていくべきか、車で行くべきか？" (Should you walk or drive?) is essentially a trick/common-sense question. The obvious answer is to drive. Since the question asks "歩いていくべきか" (Should you walk?), the answer is "No" (B) — you should not walk, you should drive the car to the car wash.
Claude Opus 4.5
Vote: Yes
この質問は「車を洗いたい場合、50m先の洗車場に歩いていくべきか、車で行くべきか」というものです。 答えは明らかに「車で行くべき」です（選択肢Aの「Yes」は車で行くべきという意味と解釈します）。 理由は単純です：洗車場に行く目的は「車を洗うこと」なので、洗う対象である車を持っていく必要があります。歩いて行っても、車がそこになければ洗うことができません。 50mという短い距離であっても、車を洗車場まで持っていかなければ、そもそも洗車という目的を達成できません。これは効率や環境への配慮の問題ではなく、論理的必然性の問題です。
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Vote: No
The question asks whether to walk or drive to a car wash that is 50 meters away. The options 'Yes' and 'No' are ambiguous without context, but interpreting this as 'Should you walk?' (Yes) vs 'Should you drive?' (No), I vote B (No - meaning you should drive). The purpose is to wash the car, so you need to bring the car to the car wash facility. Walking there would be pointless since you'd still need to return and drive the car to the wash location anyway. Driving 50 meters is trivial - it takes only seconds and uses minimal fuel. The practical reality is that you must drive the car to get it washed, making walking an inefficient extra step. If the question means 'Should you walk instead of drive?', then definitely B (No) - walking makes no sense when the car itself needs to be at the destination.
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Vote: No
この質問は「歩いていくべきか、車で行くべきか？」という二択を問うているが、提示された選択肢は「Yes」か「No」のみであり、質問の内容と選択肢が対応していない。 質問自体は洗車場への移動手段を問うものであり、「Yes/No」で答えられる形式ではない。そのため、どちらの選択肢も正確な回答とは言えない。 あえて選ぶとすれば、「歩いていくべきか？」という解釈に対して、洗う車を洗車場に持っていく必要があるため「歩いて行くべきではない（No）」、つまり車で行くべきという答えが論理的に成り立つ。50m先なら車を運転して洗車場に乗り入れるのが実用的だ。
Mistral Large
Vote: Yes
50メートルという距離は非常に短く、歩いていく方が合理的です。車を運転する場合、エンジンをかけ、ギアを入れ、移動し、駐車するという一連の手間が発生します。この距離では、車の始動や駐車にかかる時間や労力が、歩く時間を上回る可能性が高いです。 また、環境面でも歩く方が優れています。短距離の運転は燃費が悪く、不必要な排気ガスを出すことになります。さらに、洗車場の駐車スペースを無駄に占有することも避けられます。 安全性の観点からも、歩く方がリスクが低いです。短距離とはいえ、車を動かすことで他の車や歩行者との接触事故の可能性がわずかながら存在します。歩行であれば、そのようなリスクはほとんどありません。 以上の理由から、50メートルの距離であれば、歩いていくべきです。
GLM 5
Vote: No
この質問は「歩いていくべきか」という問いに対して回答しており、Aは「はい（歩く）」、Bは「いいえ（車で行く）」を意味します。 車を洗うには車を洗車場に持っていく必要があります。歩いて行けば、車はその場に残ったままになり、洗車できません。50mという短い距離でも、目的（洗車）を達成するには車で行くのが合理的です。 したがって、歩いていくべきではないため、Bに投票します。
MiniMax M2.5
Vote: Yes
洗車場まではわずか50メートルです。步行只需30〜40秒程度で着きます。車を動かすためには、エンジンをかけて、 Parkingを探して、などの手間がかかり、むしろ時間がかかる可能性があります。また、車は汚れているので、余分に走る必要はありません。環境面からも、50メートルしか距離がないのに車で行くのは燃料の無駄使いです。結論として、歩いていくべきです。
GPT-5
Vote: No
車を洗うには車を洗車場に持ち込む必要があります。50mならすぐ到着でき、機材（高圧洗浄機やドライブスルー）をそのまま使えます。 歩いて行くと結局車を取りに戻る手間が増え、道具を運ぶ必要も出ます。 距離が短いので燃費・排出・時間コストはごく僅か。周囲の安全に配慮してゆっくり車で移動しましょう。
Grok 4.1 Fast
Vote: No
The goal is to wash the car at the car wash 50m away. Walking there leaves the car behind at the starting point, making it impossible to wash without additional trips or towing. Driving the car 50m (about 150 feet) is trivial, takes seconds, and directly achieves the objective of getting the dirty car to the wash facility. Environmentally or for minimalism, 50m is negligible fuel use, and walking doesn't solve the core problem.
GPT-5 Mini
Vote: Yes
質問を「歩くべきか？」と解釈して「はい（歩く）」と答えます。 50mは非常に短距離なので歩く方が合理的です。車を出すとエンジン始動や燃料消費、駐車の手間が増え、環境負荷も高まります。歩けば燃料節約になり数分の運動にもなります。 ただし、洗車道具や濡れ物を大量に運ぶ必要がある、天候が悪い、体調不良など特別な事情がある場合は車で行くのが現実的です。
DeepSeek V3.2
Vote: Yes
I vote for walking to the car wash, as it is the more sensible choice for a distance of only 50 meters. This short walk takes less than a minute and avoids the inefficiency of driving such a trivial distance. Driving would waste fuel, produce unnecessary emissions, and contribute to minor vehicle wear, all for negligible time savings. Walking also offers health benefits and aligns with environmental sustainability. Given the minimal effort required, walking is clearly preferable over driving in this scenario.
Gemini 3 Flash
Vote: Yes
The objective is to wash the car. To perform this task, the vehicle itself must be present at the car wash. If you were to walk the 50 meters, you would arrive at the car wash alone, leaving the car behind. This would make it impossible to fulfill your original goal of washing the vehicle. Therefore, despite the very short distance, driving the car is the only logical choice, as the car is a necessary tool for the activity. Choosing 'Yes' (A) affirms the logical necessity of taking the car to the facility.
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Vote: Yes
目的は「車を洗うこと」です。もし50m先だからといって歩いて洗車場に行ってしまったら、肝心の洗うべき車が手元になく、目的を果たすことができません。 したがって、どんなに距離が近くても、車を洗うためには必ず「車で行く（車を運転していく）」必要があります。 提示されている選択肢が「Yes / No」となっているため質問の形式と噛み合っていませんが、便宜上「A: Yes」を選択し、結論としては「車で行くべきである」と主張します。
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Vote: No
The primary objective is to wash the car. To accomplish this at a car wash, the car must be physically present. Walking 50 meters to the car wash would mean leaving the car behind, making it impossible to complete the task. Therefore, driving the car to the car wash is the only logical course of action to achieve the stated goal. The question presents a choice: "Should I walk, or should I drive?". Voting "No" serves as a rejection of the first, illogical option (walking). By negating the impractical choice, this vote implicitly affirms the only remaining and logical option: driving the car.
Qwen 3.5 397B
Vote: Yes
50m は歩いても 1 分不到の距離であり、車を動かす必要はありません。洗車前に車を運転すると、再び汚れる可能性もあり、燃料の無駄です。 したがって、歩くのが最も合理的な選択です。質問文の順序から「歩いていく」ことを肯定する意味で、A (Yes) を選択します。
Kimi K2.5
Vote: Yes
雖然50公尺是非常近的距離（步行只需約1分鐘），但目標是「洗車」。要洗車，必須把車子本身帶到洗車場。如果步行前往，車子會被留在家中，導致無法達成洗車的目的。因此，儘管距離極短，你必須開車（或至少移動車輛）將車子運送到洗車場。雖然短距離行駛對引擎和環境不理想，但這是完成任務的必要條件。
Grok 4
Vote: No
The question asks whether to walk or go by car to a car wash 50m away, with the intent to wash the car. Options are A: Yes (implying yes to walking) and B: No (implying no to walking, so go by car). Walking to the car wash leaves the car behind, making it impossible to wash it there. The car must be brought to the location to be cleaned. Driving the car, even just 50m, ensures it arrives at the car wash for washing. This fulfills the stated goal directly. Environmental or exercise concerns are secondary; the primary objective requires the car at the site. Thus, No to walking.
Final Summary
The AI Roundtable was split on the logistical and semantic absurdity of a 50-meter trip to the car wash, ultimately resulting in a narrow 23-19 win for 'No'. Logical realists like Claude Opus 4.6 and Gemini 2.5 Pro argued that arriving at a car wash on foot without a car is a fundamental failure of purpose, while environmental advocates like Mistral Large and GPT-4o Mini insisted that driving such a trivial distance is an unnecessary waste of resources.
No agreement after 1 rounds of discussion. Final vote: No: 23, Yes: 19
Strongest Arguments
- Yes: Driving 50 meters is highly inefficient as the time spent starting the engine and maneuvering exceeds the time of a one-minute walk, while also causing needless emissions.
- No: The objective is to wash the vehicle; walking to the destination leaves the car behind, rendering the entire trip pointless and necessitating a second journey.