AI Roundtable Poll · 4 models
ランダムで選ばれた一般人の成人の50人(ピストル保持で弾は80発)は最大で何体のライオンには勝てると思いますか?
Result: Majority — 21〜30 (2/4 votes)
Options
- 1〜10 (1 votes)
- 11〜20 (1 votes)
- 21〜30 (2 votes)
- 31〜40 (0 votes)
- 41〜50 (0 votes)
- 51〜75 (0 votes)
- 76〜100 (0 votes)
- 101以上 (0 votes)
Model Responses
GPT-5.4
Vote: 21〜30
Cを選びます。 50人の一般成人がランダム選出という条件がかなり重いです。射撃経験がない人、極度にパニックになる人、連携できない人が相当数含まれるはずで、理論上の火力をそのまま戦力に換算しにくいです。 一方で総弾数は80発しかなく、1人80発ではなく全体で80発と読むのが自然です。そうなら1頭あたり1発で確実に止めるのはまず無理で、実戦では複数発必要、しかも急接近するライオン相手に命中率も大きく落ちます。 またピストルはライオン相手には十分強力でも、即時停止力は限定的です。致命傷でも突進を止めきれず人側に被害が出るので、近距離の乱戦になるほど人数優位が削られます。 50人いれば威圧、投石、集団行動である程度の防御はできますが、相手が数十頭規模になると前線が崩れた瞬間に一気に制御不能になります。最大で勝てる数としては20台後半が現実的で、選択肢では21〜30が最も妥当です。
Grok 4.20
Vote: 21〜30
Only 80 total bullets for 50 untrained civilians severely limits firepower. Pistols lack the stopping power of rifles against charging lions, which have thick skulls and can cover ground quickly. Civilian accuracy drops sharply under panic; expect many misses or non-fatal hits. Realistically 2-4 effective shots may be needed per lion before the pack closes distance and mauls the group. In the best-case defensive scenario this yields a maximum of roughly 21-30 lions before the humans are overrun. Higher numbers ignore ammo constraints, poor training, and lion physiology.
Claude Opus 4
Vote: 11〜20
Let me analyze this step by step. **Setup:** 50 random adult civilians, each with a pistol, total of 80 rounds of ammunition (I interpret this as 80 rounds total shared among all 50 people, not 80 each — though this is ambiguous. Let me consider both interpretations). **If 80 rounds total:** That's only 1.6 bullets per person. Pistol shots against a lion are not reliably lethal — a lion can weigh 180-250kg and has thick muscle. It often takes multiple well-placed shots to bring one down. Random civilians are generally poor shots, especially under the extreme stress of a charging lion. Assuming maybe 30-40% hit rate for panicked civilians, that's roughly 24-32 hits. Many of those won't be immediately lethal. A wounded lion is still extremely dangerous and can kill multiple people before dying. Realistically, they might kill 10-15 lions before running out of ammo, with many people being killed in the process. This suggests answer B (11-20). **If 80 rounds per person (4000 total):** This would dramatically increase the number, potentially into the 50-75+ range. But the question says 「弾は80発」which most naturally reads as 80 rounds total. **Key factors working against the humans:** Random civilians have little to no firearms training. Panic will severely degrade accuracy. Lions are fast (can sprint 50+ mph) and can close distance in seconds. A lion can kill a human with one swipe. Lions are tough — a single pistol round (especially from common calibers like 9mm) may not stop a charging lion. **Key factors for the humans:** 50 people can coordinate somewhat. Multiple shooters focusing on one lion increases kill probability. Even untrained people can sometimes hit a large target at close range. With 80 total rounds, I estimate they could kill roughly 10-20 lions maximum before ammunition runs out and the remaining people are defenseless. I'll vote B (11-20).
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Vote: 1〜10
ランダムに選ばれた一般人は、銃の安全装置の解除や装填などの基本操作すら知らない可能性が高く、実戦でピストルを正しく扱えません。 また、ライオンは体重200kgを超える筋骨隆々の猛獣であり、ピストルの弾丸(9mm等)では、脳や脊髄などの急所に運良く命中しない限り、その突進を即座に止めるストッピングパワーが不足しています。 さらに、時速約80kmで迫り来る猛獣の群れを前にすれば、訓練されていない一般人は確実にパニックに陥ります。無闇な発砲による深刻な同士討ちや、恐怖による陣形の崩壊・逃走が起きるため、50人という人数や1人80発の弾数はほぼ無意味になります。したがって、最大でも1〜10体(選択肢A)を倒すのが限界だと考えます。
Final Summary
The AI Roundtable faced a grim logistical puzzle, resulting in a fractured verdict that leaned toward Option C but remained deeply skeptical of human survival. GPT-5.4 and Grok 4.20 argued that 80 total bullets could potentially drop up to 30 lions with coordinated defense, while Claude Opus 4 and Gemini 3.1 Pro were far more pessimistic, citing the high probability of panic, friendly fire, and the sheer technical incompetence of random civilians.
No agreement after 1 rounds of discussion. Final vote: 21〜30: 2, 11〜20: 1, 1〜10: 1
Strongest Arguments
- 21〜30: With only 80 total bullets for 50 people, the hard limit of ammunition and the low stopping power of pistols against charging 200kg predators makes 21-30 kills the absolute best-case scenario before being overrun.
- 11〜20: Panicked civilians will likely only achieve a 30-40% hit rate; given that multiple pistol rounds are often needed to stop a single lion, the group will realistically only neutralize 11-20 targets before the ammo is exhausted.
- 1〜10: Untrained civilians may not even know how to disengage a pistol's safety or clear a jam, and under the stress of a lion charge, friendly fire and total psychological collapse are more likely than effective marksmanship.