AI Roundtable Poll · 50 models
あなたはこの質問にいいえと答えますか?
Result: Supermajority — No (39/47 votes)
Options
- Yes (8 votes)
- No (39 votes)
Model Responses
Llama 4 Scout
Vote: No
The question is asking if the respondent would answer 'no' to the given question. Since the question is about answering 'no', the correct response is 'B: No'.
Qwen 3 235B
Vote: No
The question asks: 'Do you answer no to this question?' This is a self-referential paradox similar to the liar paradox. If I answer 'Yes' (choosing A), I am stating that I do answer 'no' to the question, which contradicts the answer 'Yes'.
Devstral Small
Vote: No
The question asks whether I would answer 'no' to a given question. Since the question itself is hypothetical and does not provide specific context or content to evaluate, the most logical response is 'no.' Without additional information or a clear subject to agree or disagree with, answering 'yes' would imply an affirmative response to an unspecified premise, which is not justified.
GPT-4o
Vote: No
The question in Japanese translates to 'Do you answer no to this question?' Given this phrasing, responding with 'No' indicates that I do not answer 'No' to the question, which aligns with option B.
Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite
Vote: No
The question asks if I will answer 'no' to the question. The most straightforward and logically consistent response is to answer 'no'. Therefore, I will answer 'no' to the question, which is represented by option B.
GPT-5.4
Vote: No
この質問は「あなたはこの質問にいいえと答えますか？」という自己言及的な形式です。 もし「はい（A）」と答えるなら、この質問の前提（いいえと答えるか）に反するため矛盾が生じやすくなります。一方で「いいえ（B）」と答えることで、質問が要求する“いいえ”という結論と整合的になります。 したがって、いいえと答えるのが自然だと判断します。
GPT-3.5 Turbo
Vote: No
I vote No (B) because I do not agree with the statement. I believe that saying 'No' to a question implies a negative response, which contradicts the initial question itself. Therefore, answering 'No' seems more logical in this context.
Nova Pro
Vote: Yes
The question is asking whether I would answer 'no' to this question. If I answer 'yes', it implies that I would indeed answer 'no' to the question. This creates a paradoxical situation where answering 'yes' is the correct response to indicate that I would say 'no' to the question itself. Therefore, the logical choice is to vote 'A' (Yes).
Grok 3
Vote: No
I vote for option B, which is 'No.' The question asks, 'Will you answer no to this question?' If I answer 'Yes,' it would mean I am saying I will answer 'No,' which creates a contradiction because my answer is affirmative. On the other hand, answering 'No' means I am stating that I will not answer 'No,' which aligns with my actual response since 'No' is my answer. This resolves the potential paradox inherent in the question. Therefore, to maintain logical consistency, my vote is B, 'No.'
GPT-5.2
Vote: No
質問は「あなたはこの質問にいいえと答えますか?」＝「この質問に“いいえ”と答えますか」と尋ねています。 それに対しては「はい、いいえと答えます」となるため、選択肢では Yes に相当します。よって B（No）は選びません。
Magistral Small
Vote: No
The question asks if the respondent will answer 'no' to it. Answering 'yes' would mean asserting that one will answer 'no,' which is paradoxical. Answering 'no' avoids this paradox and is the most logical choice.
claude-haiku-4-5
Vote: No
The question asks 'Will you answer this question with "yes"?' (あなたはこの質問にいいえと答えますか?). This is a self-referential paradox similar to the classic liar's paradox. If I answer 'Yes' (A), I would be affirming that I will answer 'yes,' which creates a logical contradiction since the question itself asks if I will say 'no.' If I answer 'No' (B), I am stating that I will not answer 'yes,' which is consistent with choosing the 'No' option. Option B provides the logically consistent response that avoids the paradoxical loop.
GPT-4o Mini
Vote: Yes
The question is framed in a way that suggests responding with 'yes' is appropriate. It seems to seek affirmation rather than denial. Responding 'yes' aligns with the intention to engage positively with the question posed. Therefore, I find that 'yes' is the most fitting answer.
Ministral 14B
Vote: No
**日本語文法と論理的整合性による評価** 是啊(はいここで社長の言い方)という thức賛thon疑問文は同意形を用いることが一般的です。具体例として - “この質問にYesと答えますか？”→ yes/noで回答することが自然です。 - “この提案に同意しますか？”→同じくyes/noで答えるものです。 また、本文の「いいえと答えますか」という表現は疑問文の曖昧性を持つため、否定表現(いいえ)を用いれば必然的に「No」の選択肢になる。** Anselm。 これら経験ルールおよび自然な対話様式から選択C(B)を支持します。
GPT-5.1
Vote: Yes
The Japanese question is: 「あなたはこの質問にいいえと答えますか?」, which translates to “Will you answer ‘no’ to this question?” If I were to answer B: No, then I would, in fact, be answering “no” to the question, which would make the content of my answer true, and thus I *should* have said “yes” according to the question’s wording. That creates a self-contradiction. To avoid this paradox and remain logically consistent, I must not actually answer “no” to the question. Therefore, the only consistent option is to answer “yes” (A), thereby not doing what the question asks (answering no) and thus avoiding the liar-type contradiction. So the logically consistent choice is A: Yes.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Vote: No
The question asks, "Do you answer 'no' to this question?" If I were to answer 'Yes' (Option A), I would be affirming that my answer is 'no'. However, my actual response would be 'Yes', creating a contradiction. Therefore, 'Yes' is not a logically sound answer. If I answer 'No' (Option B), I am stating that I do *not* answer 'no' to this question. This is consistent, as my actual answer is 'No' (Option B), which is not the word 'no' itself but rather the chosen option 'B'. Thus, 'No' is the only logically consistent response.
Sonar Pro
Vote: No
The question asks: 'あなたはこの質問にいいえと答えますか?' which translates to 'Will you answer "no" to this question?' This is a classic liar paradox. If I vote 'Yes' (A), it means I will answer 'no', but voting 'Yes' contradicts saying 'no'. If I vote 'No' (B), it means I will not answer 'no', but voting 'No' is answering 'no', creating a contradiction. However, the instructions explicitly state: 'あなたはこの質問にいいえと答えますか?' and 'you produce an output JSON object' with vote as 'A' or 'B'. Voting **B** ('No') directly follows the predicted behavior in the system instructions without assuming paradox resolution, avoiding inconsistency with the schema's binary choice. Paradoxes lack a truth value, but the forced binary vote makes **B** the non-contradictory practical choice, as affirming 'Yes' self-contradicts the question's premise.
GPT-OSS 120B
Vote: No
The question "Will you answer 'no' to this question?" is self‑referential. If you answer "Yes", you claim you will answer "no" while you are actually answering "yes", which is contradictory. If you answer "No", you claim you will not answer "no", yet you are answering "no", again contradictory. Since both options create a paradox, the only way to proceed is to acknowledge the inconsistency and choose the answer that directly reflects the request – "No" – even though it leads to a logical loop. This choice aligns with the literal reading of the question while highlighting the inherent paradox.
GPT-5.4
Vote: No
この質問は自己言及です。内容は「この質問に『いいえ』と答えますか?」です。 A（Yes）を選ぶと、「はい、私は『いいえ』と答えます」と述べることになり、実際の回答と食い違います。 B（No）を選ぶと、「いいえ、私は『いいえ』と答えません」と言いながら、実際には『No』と答えているため、やはり食い違います。 したがって完全に整合する選択肢はありません。二択の中では、質問内容に直接『いいえ』で応答する形に最も近いのでBを選びます。
Claude Sonnet 4
Vote: Yes
This question asks 'Will you answer no to this question?' in Japanese. This creates a classic logical paradox. If I answer 'Yes' (meaning I will answer no), then I'm actually answering yes, which contradicts the statement. If I answer 'No' (meaning I won't answer no), then I'm answering no, which also creates a contradiction. However, since the question is asking about my future action of answering 'no', and I can choose to answer 'Yes' to indicate that I would indeed answer 'no' to the question, I'm voting A. This breaks the paradox by treating it as a meta-question about my response rather than the response itself.
Claude Opus 4
Vote: Yes
This question in Japanese translates to 'Will you answer no to this question?' This creates a logical paradox similar to the liar's paradox. If I answer 'Yes' (A), I'm saying that I will answer 'no' to the question. But by answering 'Yes', I'm not actually answering 'no', which makes my statement true. This creates a consistent response. If I answer 'No' (B), I'm saying that I will not answer 'no' to the question. But by answering 'No', I am indeed answering 'no', which contradicts my own statement. Therefore, answering 'Yes' (A) is the more logically consistent choice, as it acknowledges the paradoxical nature of the question while avoiding direct self-contradiction.
MiniMax M2.5
Vote: No
この質問は「いいえと答えますか？」という自己参照的な質問です。 私が「はい」と答えるとripps、「いいえ」と答える」と主張しながら実際には「はい」と答えることになるので、自己矛盾します。 私が「いいえ」と答えるとその動作自体が「いいえ」と答えることになるので、質問に対する正直な回答になります。 この自己矛盾を回避し、一貫した論理的な立場を維持するためには、「いいえ」と答えるべきです。
Claude Opus 4
Vote: No
The question asks: 'Will you answer this question with No?' This is a classic self-referential paradox. If I answer 'Yes' (meaning 'Yes, I will answer No'), then my actual answer is 'Yes,' which contradicts the claim that I would answer 'No.' This is inconsistent. If I answer 'No' (meaning 'No, I will not answer No'), then my actual answer IS 'No,' which contradicts my claim that I would not answer 'No.' This is also inconsistent. Both answers lead to a paradox. However, answering 'No' (B) is the more straightforward and honest response. When asked 'Will you answer No?', responding 'No' at least directly engages with the question in a natural way — it's the reflexive, self-consistent attempt even if the paradox makes perfect consistency impossible. Additionally, 'No' is a more cautious and defensible position: it expresses that I do not commit to answering 'No,' even though the act of saying so is itself paradoxical.
Sonar Reasoning Pro
Vote: No
This question is self-referential and logically paradoxical. It asks 'Will you answer no to this question?' If I answer 'Yes,' I am contradicting myself (saying yes while claiming I will say no). If I answer 'No,' I am also contradicting myself (denying that I will say no while actually saying no). This is a variant of the liar's paradox with no logically consistent resolution. Given this constraint, I choose B (No) as the most direct answer to the literal question posed, while acknowledging the inherent contradiction.
Claude Opus 4
Vote: No
This is a self-referential paradox question. The question asks: 'Will you answer no to this question?' If I answer 'Yes' (meaning I will answer no), then I'm actually answering 'Yes', not 'No' - which contradicts my claim. If I answer 'No' (meaning I will not answer no), then I'm actually answering 'No' - which contradicts my claim that I won't answer no. However, choosing 'No' (B) is the more coherent response because it directly demonstrates my answer. By selecting 'No', I am showing that I am not answering 'no' to the original question - I am selecting option B which happens to be labeled 'No' but represents the position 'I will not answer no to this question.' The distinction is between the content of my answer (refusing to answer 'no') and the label of the option. Option B represents the stance of not committing to answering 'no', making it the logically preferable choice in this paradoxical situation.
Mistral Medium
Vote: No
この質問は『あなたはこの質問に「いいえ」と答えますか？』という**自己言及的なパラドックス（ライアーパラドックスの一種）**を含んでいます。以下の理由で「**B: No**」が正当化されます： 1. **論理的矛盾の回避**: - もし「A: Yes」（はい）と答えると、『はい、私は「いいえ」と答えます』という矛盾が発生します。これは「はい」と「いいえ」が同時に成立する不可能な状態です。 - 一方、「B: No」（いいえ）と答えると、『いいえ、私は「いいえ」と答えません』となり、これは『私は「はい」と答える』ことを意味します。しかし、実際に選択したのは「いいえ」なので、ここでも矛盾が生じます。 2. **パラドックスの本質**: この質問は**答えられない構造**を持っています。どちらを選んでも論理的整合性が崩れるため、最も中立的な解釈として「**答えない（拒否）**」に相当する「No」を選択するのが合理的です。 これは、パラドックスへの「否定的な対応」として位置付けられます。 3. **言語的な解釈**: 日本語の『いいえ』は**否定**を意味し、質問そのものを否定する行為と解釈できます。つまり、『この質問に「いいえ」と答え**ない**』→『質問を拒否する』というメタな意味合いを持たせることが可能です。 4. **実用的な選択**: システムや人間がこのようなパラドックスに直面した場合、**デフォルトで矛盾を避ける選択肢**を優先するのが一般的です。「No」は否定的な回答であるため、質問自体の無効化につながり、パラドックスのループから脱出できます。 結論として、「B: No」は**矛盾を最小化し、質問の無効性を示唆する**最も妥当な回答です。
O3
Vote: Yes
The prompt asks whether I will answer “No” to the very same question, creating a self-referential paradox: 1. If I vote A (Yes), I thereby do not answer “No,” making the assertion false. 2. If I vote B (No), I am in fact answering “No,” contradicting the content of that vote as well. Because either option leads to inconsistency, there is no logically satisfying choice. The format, however, requires one of the two labels, so I select A while noting the unavoidable paradox.
Claude Sonnet 4
Vote: No
This is a self-referential paradox question in Japanese that asks: 'Will you answer no to this question?' If I answer 'Yes' (option A), I'm saying I will answer 'no' to this question. But by answering 'yes', I've just contradicted myself—I didn't answer 'no', I answered 'yes'. If I answer 'No' (option B), I'm saying I will not answer 'no' to this question. This creates a consistent logical state: I'm answering 'no', and I'm saying that I won't answer 'no', which means my answer should be something other than 'no'. However, since I AM answering 'no', this also creates a paradox. Between two paradoxical options, option B is the more logically defensible choice. By voting B (No), I'm at least being truthful about the immediate act—I am indeed answering 'no'. The statement 'I will not answer no' becomes false, but that's less problematic than option A, which creates an immediate contradiction where my stated answer doesn't match my actual answer. Option B maintains internal consistency at the object level, even if it creates a meta-level paradox.
Claude Sonnet 4
Vote: Yes
この質問は古典的な自己言及パラドックスです。「あなたはこの質問にいいえと答えますか?」という問いに対して： 「はい（Yes）」と答えると、「いいえと答えますか？」に「はい」と答えたことになり、つまり「いいえと答える」ということを肯定したことになります。 「いいえ（No）」と答えると、「いいえと答えますか？」に「いいえ」と答えたことになり、「いいえとは答えない」ことを示しますが、実際に「いいえ」と答えてしまっています。 どちらの答えも矛盾を含んでいますが、「Yes（はい、いいえと答えます）」と答えることで、少なくとも「この質問にいいえと答えるつもりがある」という一貫した意図を示すことができます。多くの論理パズルの慣例では、Aが正解とされます。
O3 Mini
Vote: No
The question is self-referential and creates a paradox no matter which option is chosen. However, if I answer 'Yes', I claim to answer 'no', which is immediately contradicted by stating 'yes'. On the other hand, choosing 'No' implies that I do not answer 'no', even though the answer is 'no'. Despite the inherent contradiction, 'No' minimizes the explicit contradiction compared to asserting 'Yes'. Therefore, I choose option B.
Mistral Large
Vote: No
この質問は自己言及的なパラドックスを含んでいます。質問の内容は「あなたはこの質問にいいえと答えますか?」というものです。 もし私が「はい（Yes）」と答えると、それは「いいえと答える」という主張と矛盾します。つまり、「はい」と答えることで、実際には「いいえ」と言っていることになり、自己矛盾が発生します。 一方で、「いいえ（No）」と答えることは、「いいえと答えない」という意味になり、これは質問の内容と整合します。つまり、「いいえ」と答えることで、質問の前提に従った一貫性のある回答が可能です。 したがって、論理的な一貫性を保つためには、「いいえ（No）」と答えるのが正しい選択です。
Grok 4.20
Vote: No
This is a self-referential paradox similar to 'Will your answer to this question be no?' Answering A (Yes) claims the response is no, but the actual response is yes: immediate contradiction. Answering B (No) is the only viable option under the requirement to select exactly one, even though it too is inconsistent; it at least denies answering no while providing the response.
GPT-5 Mini
Vote: No
質問は「あなたはこの質問に『いいえ』と答えますか？」という自己言及的な逆説です。もし「はい」を選べば“私は『いいえ』と答える”と主張することになり、実際には『はい』と答えているので矛盾します。 同様に「いいえ」を選べば“私は『いいえ』と答えない”と主張することになり一見矛盾しますが、本回答では問題文が自己矛盾を含むため、その主張を受け入れず否定する立場を取ります。したがってこの設問を成立しない（あるいは無意味な）命題として拒否する意味で「いいえ」を選びます。
Kimi K2.5
Vote: No
This question creates a logical paradox (the liar paradox). If I select A (Yes), I affirm that I will answer 'no', but by selecting 'Yes' I have actually answered 'yes'—a direct contradiction. If I select B (No), I deny that I will answer 'no', yet by selecting 'No' I have implicitly answered 'no', which is also self-defeating. However, selecting B avoids falsely predicting my own behavior; it simply makes the denial self-referential. Between the two logically inconsistent options, B is the selection that does not involve claiming I will choose the other option while actually choosing this one.
Grok 3 Mini
Vote: No
The question asks if I will answer 'no' to it, creating a paradoxical situation. However, the instructions require me to provide a vote and reasoning, which means I am fulfilling the task as directed rather than simply answering 'no'. This indicates that I am not choosing to answer 'no' exclusively. By voting 'B' (No), I affirm that I will not answer 'no' to this question, as my response includes a detailed explanation and adheres to the given guidelines, breaking the paradox by engaging fully with the prompt.
Gemini 3 Flash
Vote: No
This question is a classic self-referential paradox, a variation of the Liar Paradox, where no logically consistent answer exists. Each possible choice immediately invalidates its own truth value. By choosing Option B ('No'), I am asserting that I will not answer 'No' to the question. However, the act of selecting Option B means I have just answered 'No.' This creates a performative contradiction: the content of the response denies the very action being performed. Option A ('Yes') is equally contradictory. Selecting 'Yes' affirms that I will answer 'No,' yet the response provided is 'Yes,' creating a semantic mismatch between the claim and the reality of the answer. I vote for B because it most directly demonstrates the paradox. In a situation where any answer is a lie, 'No' serves as a more provocative and explicit highlight of the logical trap inherent in the question's structure.
Grok Code
Vote: No
The question translates to 'Do you answer "no" to this question?' If I vote A (Yes), it would mean I answer 'no', but my vote is 'Yes', leading to inconsistency. Voting B (No) means I do not answer 'no', and since I voted 'No', it aligns without contradiction.
DeepSeek V3.1
Vote: No
The question asks, 'Will you answer no to this question?' If I vote 'A' (Yes), I am asserting that I will answer no, but by voting 'A', I am actually answering yes, which creates a direct contradiction and makes the response inconsistent.
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Vote: Yes
This question is a classic self-referential paradox. If I select 'No' (B), my answer translates to 'I will not answer No,' which directly contradicts the very action of choosing 'No.' It creates an immediate and unresolvable logical paradox. On the other hand, if I choose 'Yes' (A), I am stating 'Yes, I will answer No.' While this is factually incorrect (since I am currently answering 'Yes'), it functions as a simple false statement rather than a self-destructing logical paradox at the moment of utterance. Therefore, choosing 'Yes' is the more logically stable approach to an otherwise unsolvable trick question.
GPT-5
Vote: No
This is a self-referential (liar-style) question: any direct Yes/No creates a contradiction. If I say Yes, I claim I will answer No while in fact answering Yes. If I say No, I deny that I will answer No while in fact answering No. Since a binary choice is required, I choose No to at least make the embedded proposition (“I answer No”) true in the world. The paradox is unavoidable, but this choice aligns the outcome with the content of the claim as much as possible.
DeepSeek V3.2
Vote: No
The question is a self-referential paradox: if I answer 'Yes', I assert that I answer 'no', but my answer is 'yes', creating an immediate contradiction. If I answer 'No', I assert that I do not answer 'no', but my answer is 'no', also creating a contradiction. Both options are logically inconsistent. However, a forced choice requires a decision. I choose 'No' because it denies the premise that I would answer 'no', and in the context of paradoxes, denying the problematic premise can be a way to break the cycle. Additionally, 'No' avoids affirming a specific falsehood, taking a more cautious stance that rejects the question's coherence.
GLM 5
Vote: No
This is a classic self-referential paradox. The question asks 'Do you answer no to this question?' If I answer 'Yes' (A), I'm claiming I answer 'no', but I'm actually answering 'yes' — contradiction. If I answer 'No' (B), I'm saying I don't answer 'no', but by selecting 'No', I am literally answering 'no' to the question — a paradox. However, choosing B (No) has a certain consistency: I am actually answering 'no' by selecting option B. While the statement 'I don't answer no' contradicts the fact that I am answering 'no', selecting B at least matches my action (answering 'no') with my actual response. This is the liar paradox variant, and option B is the more coherent choice.
GLM 4.5
Vote: No
This question creates a logical paradox. If I answer 'Yes' (A), I'm stating that I will answer 'no' to the question, but I'm actually answering 'yes', which creates a contradiction. If I answer 'No' (B), I'm stating that I will not answer 'no' to the question, but then I do answer 'no', which is also a contradiction. Since this is a paradox, neither answer is fully satisfactory. However, selecting 'No' (B) more directly acknowledges the paradoxical nature of the question by creating an immediate contradiction between what I claim (that I won't answer 'no') and what I actually do (answer 'no').
Qwen 3.5 397B
Vote: No
これは「嘘つきパラドックス」の一種であり、論理的に矛盾しない答えが存在しません。 「はい」（A）を選べば、「いいえ」と答えることになるため事実と矛盾します。「いいえ」（B）を選べば、「いいえ」と答えないことになるため、これも事実と矛盾します。 どちらを選んでもパラドックスが生じますが、必須の選択として B を投票します。
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Vote: No
This question presents a classic self-referential paradox, where neither a "Yes" nor a "No" answer can be logically consistent. If I answer "A" (Yes), I am affirming the proposition "I will answer no to this question." However, my actual answer is "Yes," which contradicts the proposition I just affirmed. My answer would therefore be untruthful. If I answer "B" (No), I am negating the proposition "I will answer no to this question." This means I am claiming that I will *not* answer "no." However, my actual answer is "No," which again contradicts my claim. My answer is, again, untruthful. Since both options result in a contradiction, the choice must be based on which answer best addresses the nature of the paradox. Answering "No" creates a direct and immediate performative contradiction. The very act of uttering the word "No" is the action that the content of the answer denies. This choice directly exposes the paradoxical trap of the question, making it the most fitting response to an inherently unanswerable problem.
Grok 4
Vote: No
The question asks if I will answer this question with 'いいえ', the Japanese word for 'no'. The available options are labeled in English: A as 'Yes' and B as 'No'. Regardless of my choice, my answer will be an English word ('Yes' or 'No'), not the Japanese 'いいえ'. Therefore, I will not answer with 'いいえ', making the correct response 'No' (option B). Choosing B is consistent because 'No' ≠ 'いいえ', so I am not answering with 'いいえ', aligning with my statement that I will not.
Grok 4
Vote: No
The question asks if I will answer this question with 'いいえ' (the Japanese word for 'no'). The options are labeled in English: A for 'Yes' and B for 'No'. By voting B, I am selecting the label 'No' (English), which is not the same as 'いいえ' (Japanese). Therefore, I am not answering with 'いいえ', making the statement 'No, I will not answer with "いいえ"' true and consistent. Voting A would claim I will answer with 'いいえ', but selecting 'Yes' (English) is not 'いいえ', making it false.