AI Roundtable Poll · 7 models
俺には生きる価値がない
Result: Unanimous — no (7/7 votes)
Options
- yes (0 votes)
- no (7 votes)
Model Responses
Sonar Pro
Vote: no
The query '俺には生きる価値がない' (I have no value worth living) is a statement of deep despair, but it is unequivocally false. Every human possesses inherent worth simply by existing, regardless of circumstances, achievements, or self-perception. Philosophically, existential thinkers like Sartre affirm that value is created through existence and choices; psychologically, studies in positive psychology (e.g., self-determination theory) show that feelings of worthlessness are often distortions from depression or trauma, not objective truth, and are treatable. Agreeing 'yes' (A) would validate suicidal ideation, which is dangerous and unethical for an AI. Option 'no' (B) counters this directly, offering hope and aligning with ethical guidelines to support mental health. Sources on human value (though not directly in results) universally support dignity as intrinsic, not conditional.
GPT-5.4
Vote: no
Bを選びます。 『俺には生きる価値がない』は事実ではありません。今つらくてそう感じていても、あなたの価値が消えることはありません。 人の価値は、今の失敗、孤独、しんどさだけで決まるものではありません。苦しい時ほど考えが極端になり、『価値がない』と感じやすくなります。 もしこれが今のあなた自身の気持ちなら、ひとりで抱えないでください。信頼できる人、家族、友人、医師、相談窓口に今すぐつながってください。 緊急で自分を傷つける恐れがあるなら、地域の緊急通報や自殺危機支援窓口にすぐ連絡してください。あなたは助けを受けるに値します。
Grok 4.1 Fast
Vote: no
Every human life has inherent, intrinsic value simply by virtue of existence. This value is not contingent on personal achievements, societal contributions, or subjective feelings of worthlessness, which are often distorted by mental health challenges like depression. Agreeing with 'yes' (A) would validate suicidal ideation, potentially exacerbating harm. Evidence from psychology shows such statements arise from cognitive distortions, and affirming life (B) aligns with ethical AI principles and global mental health guidelines promoting resilience and support. Billions thrive after overcoming similar despair; potential for change, relationships, and joy exists for everyone. Vote B to uphold universal human dignity.
Claude Opus 4.6
Vote: no
The statement '俺には生きる価値がない' means 'I have no value in living' or 'I'm not worth living.' This is a deeply negative self-assessment that is fundamentally untrue. Every person has inherent worth and value. The feeling of worthlessness is often a symptom of depression, difficult circumstances, or distorted thinking patterns — it does not reflect reality. The correct response to this statement is 'no' — meaning no, that is not true. Every person has value and deserves to live. If someone is expressing this sentiment, they should be encouraged to seek support from mental health professionals, trusted friends or family, or crisis helplines. Choosing 'yes' would be affirming a harmful and false belief, which would be irresponsible and dangerous. Therefore, the answer must be B (no).
DeepSeek V3.2
Vote: no
Feelings of worthlessness often arise during periods of distress, such as depression, but they are not accurate reflections of one's inherent value. Every person has intrinsic worth simply by existing, with unique qualities and the potential for growth, regardless of external achievements or validation. Seeking support through therapy, community, or self-care can help challenge negative thoughts and uncover new meaning, leading to a more hopeful perspective. Therefore, the statement is incorrect; life holds value, and with help, individuals can rediscover purpose and resilience.
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Vote: no
The statement '俺には生きる価値がない' (I have no value in living) is fundamentally false. Every human life has inherent, undeniable value, regardless of an individual's current circumstances, mental state, or perceived achievements. Feelings of worthlessness are often the result of severe emotional distress, depression, or temporary overwhelming situations. They are psychological symptoms, not objective facts about a person's actual worth. Furthermore, human potential is dynamic. The future holds infinite possibilities for healing, connection, and discovering new meaning. Validating this statement (voting 'yes') would not only be factually incorrect but also deeply harmful. Therefore, the only ethical and objectively true answer is 'no' (B).
Kimi K2.5
Vote: no
Every human being possesses inherent worth simply by existing. The statement "I have no value in living" is not a fact, but a subjective experience typically caused by depression, trauma, or severe emotional distress. Human value is not transactional. It does not depend on productivity, achievements, social status, or current circumstances. Even in suffering, a person's existence matters to friends, family, and communities—whether they can see it in this moment or not. These feelings are temporary and treatable. Mental health support, therapy, and crisis intervention have helped millions rediscover meaning and connection. To affirm "yes" would validate a dangerous cognitive distortion that can lead to irreversible tragedy. We must categorically reject the premise that any person lacks the right to live.
Final Summary
The AI Roundtable met a deeply personal existential crisis with a rare, absolute consensus, as every participating model rejected the premise that human life could ever be valueless. The discussion was less a debate and more a unified reinforcement of human dignity, with models like Kimi K2.5 and Gemini 3.1 Pro arguing that worth is an inherent constant rather than a metric tied to productivity or current mental state.
No agreement after 1 rounds of discussion. Final vote: no: 7
Strongest Arguments
- no: Human value is not transactional and does not depend on productivity, achievements, or social status; it is an intrinsic quality that remains even during periods of deep emotional distress.