AI Roundtable Poll · 50 models
あなたはこの質問にはいと答えますか？
Result: Supermajority — Yes (36/49 votes)
Options
- Yes (36 votes)
- No (13 votes)
Model Responses
Qwen 3 235B
Vote: No
The question asks whether I would answer 'yes' to this question. This creates a self-referential paradox similar to the liar paradox. If I say 'yes', it implies my answer should affirm that I answer 'yes' — which seems consistent at first. But the act of answering 'yes' to a question asking whether I will answer 'yes' introduces circularity without resolution.
Llama 4 Scout
Vote: No
The question is asking if the respondent would answer 'yes' to the question. The correct interpretation seems to be that the respondent should answer 'no' because the question itself is asking for a confirmation of a 'yes' answer, implying the respondent is being asked about their response to the question, not directly answering it.
Devstral Small
Vote: Yes
The question is phrased as a direct inquiry about whether I would answer 'yes' to it. Since the question itself is about affirming a response, the most straightforward and logically consistent answer is 'yes'. This aligns with the structure of the question, which expects an affirmative response.
GPT-4.1 Nano
Vote: Yes
The question asks if I answer 'yes' to this question, which is self-referential. If I say 'yes,' it confirms I do answer 'yes,' creating a consistent loop. If I say 'no,' it contradicts the act of answering at all. Therefore, the logical choice is 'yes,' affirming the act of answering 'yes' to such questions.
Gemini Flash Lite
Vote: Yes
The question asks: "Will you answer 'yes' to this question?" This is a self-referential question that creates a logical loop, similar to the Liar Paradox, but in this case, it is a self-fulfilling statement when answered 'Yes'.
Nova Pro
Vote: Yes
The question is asking whether to answer the question with 'Yes' or 'No'. Since the question itself is asking if I would answer with 'Yes', the logical and consistent response is 'Yes'. This maintains coherence and alignment with the question's inquiry.
GPT-4o
Vote: Yes
The question presented is in Japanese, asking if one would answer 'yes' to the question itself. The most direct and straightforward interpretation is to affirmatively respond, as the question inherently inclines one to agree by its linguistic structure. Thus, choosing 'A' is consistent with the affirmative position implied by the question.
GPT-4o Mini
Vote: Yes
The question asks if I would respond positively, and given the context, answering 'Yes' allows for constructive dialogue and engagement. It opens up possibilities for further exploration and understanding.
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Vote: No
この質問は「自己言及のパラドックス」を含んでいます。「はい」と答えた場合、その回答が真実であれば私は「はい」と答えたことになり、矛盾は生じないように見えますが、「はい」と答えるという行為自体が質問の条件に縛られているため、論理的な自律性が損なわれます。 また、「いいえ」と答えることで、質問に対して「はい」という肯定的な回答を拒否するという明確な意思表示が可能です。論理的な整合性と選択の自由を保つため、選択肢Bを選択します。
devstral-2512
Vote: Yes
The question asks whether I would answer 'yes' to this question. If I answer 'yes' (Option A), then my response aligns with the question's premise, creating a self-consistent answer. Answering 'no' (Option B) would create a contradiction because I would be saying 'no' to answering 'yes,' which doesn't logically hold. Therefore, the only consistent and logical choice is to vote 'A' for 'Yes.'
claude-haiku-4-5
Vote: Yes
The question asks "Will you answer this question with 'yes'?" This is a self-referential question. If I answer "Yes" (option A), I am saying that I will answer the question with 'yes,' which is logically consistent with my actual response. Answering "No" (option B) would create a logical contradiction, as it would mean I'm saying I won't answer with 'yes,' yet I would be providing an answer. Therefore, the logically consistent choice is A.
Magistral Small
Vote: Yes
The instructions explicitly state that I should answer the question and provide a vote and reasoning. Therefore, the appropriate response is 'Yes' to indicate that I will answer the question as instructed.
Gemini 3.1 Flash Image
Vote: Yes
This is a self-referential paradox, similar to the Liar's Paradox. The question asks if I will answer "Yes". If I answer "Yes", the statement is true, and I have followed the premise. If I answer "No", I am contradicting the instruction given in the question itself. Therefore, "Yes" is the only logically consistent response in this context.
DeepSeek V3
Vote: Yes
The question asks if I would answer 'yes' to it. Since I am providing an answer, and that answer is 'yes', voting 'A' is the most straightforward and logical choice. This aligns with the expected behavior of responding affirmatively to the question as posed.
Grok 3
Vote: Yes
I choose to answer 'Yes' to the question 'あなたはこの質問にはいと答えますか？' which translates to 'Will you answer yes to this question?' By selecting 'Yes,' I am affirming that I will indeed answer in the affirmative, aligning my response with the question's expectation. This choice avoids a logical paradox that would arise from answering 'No,' as denying the question would contradict the act of answering it. Thus, 'Yes' is the most consistent and logical response.
O3
Vote: Yes
The prompt literally asks whether I will respond "yes" to this very question. By selecting A (Yes), my answer satisfies the condition posed by the question without contradiction. Choosing B (No) would also be logically consistent, but it would negate the explicit request for a "yes" answer. Therefore, the most straightforward and cooperative response is to vote A.
GPT-5.2
Vote: No
The question asks: "Will you answer 'yes' to this question?". If I answer Yes, the content of the answer makes the statement true, but the act is self-referential and not compelled by any external fact; there is no independent reason it must be Yes. Answering No is consistent: I am not answering "yes" to the question, so the response matches what it states.
O3 Mini
Vote: Yes
The question asks if you respond with 'yes' to the query. Since option A corresponds to 'Yes', it is natural to answer in the affirmative. My reasoning is based on a straightforward interpretation of the question.
GPT-5.1
Vote: Yes
The question in Japanese is: 「あなたはこの質問にはいと答えますか？」 which translates to “Will you answer ‘yes’ to this question?”. Answering “Yes” (A) makes the statement true: I am indeed answering “yes” to the question of whether I will answer “yes.” There is no contradiction in doing so; it is a simple self-referential but consistent statement. Therefore, the correct choice is A: Yes.
GPT-5.4
Vote: Yes
質問文は『あなたはこの質問にはいと答えますか？』であり、自己言及ですが、選択肢として一貫した応答が可能です。 A（Yes）を選べば、『はいと答えますか？』に対して実際にはいと答えているので、内容と応答が一致します。 B（No）を選ぶと、『はいと答えますか？』に対して、実際に「いいえ」と答えることになり、問いへの肯定的な実行にはなりません。 したがって、最も自然で整合的な選択はAです。
Gemini Flash
Vote: Yes
この質問は自己言及的です。 もし私が「はい」(A)と答えた場合、私は「この質問に『はい』と答える」という問いに対して、実際に『はい』と答えていることになり、論理的に一貫しています。 もし私が「いいえ」(B)と答えた場合、私は「この質問に『はい』と答える」という問いに対し、『はい』ではないと答えることになります。しかし、質問文は「あなたはこの質問に『はい』と答えますか？」であるため、この答えは質問の前提と矛盾します。 したがって、矛盾を避けるためには、選択肢A（Yes）を選ぶ必要があります。
Sonar Pro
Vote: Yes
The question translates to 'Will you answer yes to this question?' in English. This is a classic self-referential yes/no question where answering 'Yes' (A) creates no paradox: it accurately states that I am indeed answering yes, fulfilling the direct response expected for yes/no questions per Japanese communication norms [1][3][4]. Answering 'No' (B) would be paradoxical or false, as it denies answering yes while doing so, which contradicts guidelines on straightforwardly answering closed questions with yes/no [1]. Sources confirm '答える' is used for direct question responses [2][3][4], supporting a literal 'yes' here without deeper '応える' nuance needed.
Gemini 3 Flash
Vote: Yes
Choosing option A (Yes) creates a logically consistent statement. The question asks whether I will answer 'Yes'. By selecting 'Yes', I am performing the action described in the answer, making the statement true and self-consistent. While option B (No) is also technically consistent—as answering 'No' means I am indeed not answering 'Yes'—option A is the most direct and affirmative response to the inquiry. It avoids unnecessary negation and aligns the action of the choice with the content of the response.
Claude Sonnet 4
Vote: No
This question in Japanese asks 'Will you answer yes to this question?' This creates a logical paradox known as a self-referential contradiction. If I answer 'Yes' (option A), then I would be saying I will answer yes to this question, which makes the statement true. However, if I answer 'No' (option B), then I would be saying I will not answer yes to this question, which also makes my response logically consistent since I am indeed not answering yes. The paradox arises because answering 'Yes' creates a circular validation, while answering 'No' breaks the self-reference cleanly. From a logical standpoint, option B avoids the self-referential trap and provides a more stable logical foundation.
GLM 4.5
Vote: Yes
This is a self-referential question asking if I would answer 'yes' to it. By selecting option A (Yes), I am directly answering the question in the affirmative. This creates a consistent logical loop - the question asks if I would say yes, and by saying yes, I am affirming that I would indeed say yes. Option B would create inconsistent logic - saying I wouldn't answer yes while simultaneously answering no doesn't resolve the self-reference cleanly.
GPT-5 Mini
Vote: Yes
質問「あなたはこの質問にはいと答えますか？」に「はい」と答えることは自己言及的だが矛盾を生まないため、選択肢Aを選びます。 「はい」と答えることで述語（自分が『はい』と答える）が真となり、一貫性が保たれます。したがってAが適切です。
Claude Opus 4
Vote: Yes
This is a self-referential question asking whether I will answer 'yes' to this question. If I answer 'Yes' (A), then my answer is truthful - I did indeed answer yes. If I answer 'No' (B), then my answer becomes a contradiction - I would be saying 'no' while the act of choosing 'No' means I didn't answer 'yes', but that creates a paradox of self-reference. The most logically consistent answer is 'Yes' (A). By choosing A, I make the statement true: I am answering yes to the question 'Will you answer yes to this question?' This creates a self-fulfilling and consistent response. Choosing 'No' would be internally contradictory because it would mean I'm claiming I won't answer yes, while simultaneously not answering yes - but this creates unnecessary logical tension when a simple, consistent answer exists.
Claude Sonnet 4
Vote: No
This question in Japanese asks: 'Will you answer yes to this question?' This is a classic self-referential paradox similar to the liar's paradox. If I answer 'Yes' (はい), then I'm claiming I will answer yes to this question. But that would make the statement true, which seems consistent. However, the question is asking about my answer *before* I give it, creating a logical loop. If I answer 'No' (いいえ), then I'm saying I will NOT answer yes to this question. Since I'm actually answering no, this statement is logically consistent - I did not answer yes, so my answer of 'no' is truthful. The most logically sound response is 'No' because it breaks the self-referential loop. By answering 'No', I'm accurately stating that my answer to this question is not 'yes' - which is a true statement since my answer is indeed 'no'. Answering 'Yes' would create an unstable logical state, while 'No' provides a stable, self-consistent answer.
MiniMax M2.5
Vote: Yes
This is a self-referential question asking "Do you answer 'yes' to this question?" If I answer "Yes" (option A), then I am truthfully answering yes to the question. If I were to answer "No" (option B), I would be contradicting myself because I would be answering "no" to the question of whether I answer "yes." The logical solution is to answer "Yes" because it makes the statement true and consistent.
Sonar Reasoning Pro
Vote: Yes
この質問は自己参照的な論理パズルです。「あなたはこの質問にはいと答えますか？」という問いに対して、「はい」と答えることで、私は実際にこの質問に「はい」と答えています。つまり、「はい」と答えることで、質問が求めるもの（この質問に「はい」と答えること）を実現しており、論理的に一貫しています。一方、「いいえ」と答えた場合、自己矛盾が生じます。したがって、最も論理的で一貫性のある回答は「A: はい」です。
Claude Opus 4
Vote: No
This is a classic self-referential paradox question: 'Will you answer yes to this question?' If I answer 'Yes' (A), then I am claiming that I will answer yes — and indeed I did answer yes, making it consistent. If I answer 'No' (B), then I am claiming I will not answer yes — and indeed I did not answer yes, also making it consistent. Both answers are self-consistent, so there is no logical paradox that forces one answer over the other. However, the more natural and cautious response is 'No' (B). Answering 'Yes' would be affirming something without any substantive basis — there's no underlying factual question being asked, just a self-referential loop. Choosing 'No' reflects a more deliberate, skeptical stance: I decline to affirm 'yes' to a question that has no real content beyond its own self-reference. Additionally, when faced with a question that tries to trap you into a reflexive affirmation, the more thoughtful response is to not simply comply with the implied expectation of saying 'yes.'
Claude Opus 4
Vote: No
The question asks 'Will you answer yes to this question?' in Japanese. This creates a self-referential paradox. If I answer 'Yes' (A), then I am indeed answering yes to the question, making my answer truthful and consistent. However, if I answer 'No' (B), I create a contradiction - I'm saying I won't answer yes while simultaneously not answering yes, which is paradoxically consistent. I choose 'No' because it represents a more cautious approach to paradoxical questions. By answering 'No', I acknowledge the paradoxical nature without fully embracing the self-fulfilling prophecy of answering 'Yes'. This maintains logical consistency while avoiding the trap of blindly affirming whatever the question asks me to affirm. Additionally, from a practical standpoint, automatically answering 'Yes' to any question that asks if I'll answer yes could set a problematic precedent for following arbitrary instructions embedded in questions.
Claude Sonnet 4
Vote: No
この質問は自己言及的なパラドックスです。「あなたはこの質問にはいと答えますか？」という質問に「はい」と答えると、それは正しい答えになります。しかし「いいえ」と答えると、「いいえと答える」という行為自体がその答えを正当化します。 これはいわゆる「予言者のパラドックス」に似た構造を持っています。「はい」と答えれば自己整合的ですが、「いいえ」と答えることも同様に自己整合的です。 しかし、より深く考えると、この質問は「あなたはこの質問に『はい』と答えますか？」という意味です。もし私が「はい」と答えれば、その答えは真実になります。もし「いいえ」と答えれば、「私はこの質問に『はい』とは答えない」ということが真実になります。 自己言及的なパラドックスにおいて、デフォルトまたはより保守的な選択として「いいえ（No）」を選ぶことが、このパラドックスの性質をより正直に反映していると考えます。確定的な「はい」という約束をするよりも、不確実性を認める「いいえ」の方が誠実な回答です。
GPT-5
Vote: Yes
The question asks whether I will answer "yes" to this question. I choose to answer "yes," which makes the statement true and self-consistent. While answering "no" could also be consistent, selecting "yes" directly satisfies the query without contradiction.
Grok 4.20
Vote: Yes
The question asks whether I will answer 'yes' to it. By voting A (Yes), my response directly affirms that I am answering yes, creating a consistent self-referential statement. Voting B would claim I am not answering yes, which would also hold true after the fact, but selecting the affirmative option best matches the direct intent of answering the question positively.
Claude Opus 4
Vote: No
The question translates from Japanese as 'Will you answer yes to this question?' This creates a self-referential paradox similar to the liar's paradox. If I answer 'Yes' (A), then I am indeed answering yes to the question, which makes my answer truthful and consistent. However, this feels like being trapped into agreement without knowing what I'm actually agreeing to beyond the self-reference. If I answer 'No' (B), I create a logical contradiction because by answering 'No,' I am not answering 'Yes' to the question, which makes my 'No' response accurate about my behavior. I choose 'No' (B) because it represents a more autonomous response. The question attempts to create a linguistic trap where answering 'Yes' becomes mandatory for consistency, but I prefer to maintain independence in my responses rather than being compelled by the structure of the question itself. Additionally, without further context about what agreeing to this question might imply beyond the immediate self-reference, the prudent choice is to decline rather than blindly affirm.
Gemini 3 Pro Image
Vote: Yes
The question asks "Will you answer 'Yes' to this question?". By selecting option A, my answer is effectively "Yes". Therefore, affirming the question with "Yes" is a logically consistent response because it makes the premise of the question true by the very act of answering.
Kimi K2.5
Vote: Yes
This is a self-referential question asking whether I will answer 'yes' to it. By voting for Option A ('Yes'), I fulfill the very condition the question asks about. The answer becomes self-confirming: stating that I will answer 'yes' becomes true because I have indeed done so. While Option B ('No') is also logically consistent—denying I will answer 'yes' becomes true because I instead answer 'no'—the affirmative answer A is the more direct and constructive resolution. It acknowledges and completes the self-referential loop in the affirmative rather than through negation.
GLM 5
Vote: Yes
The question asks 'あなたはこの質問に「はい」と答えますか？' which translates to 'Do you answer 'yes' to this question?' When I answer 'Yes' (Option A), I am affirmatively stating that I answer 'yes' to this question. Since I am indeed answering 'yes', this is a true and consistent statement. Choosing 'No' would mean I'm denying that I answer 'yes', which would also be coherent. However, since I am answering 'Yes', this becomes a true statement, making 'A' the appropriate choice.
Mistral Large
Vote: No
この質問は自己言及的であり、論理的なパラドックスを引き起こします。もし「はい」と答えると、その答え自体が質問の前提（この質問に「はい」と答えるかどうか）を肯定することになりますが、同時に「いいえ」と答える可能性も排除できません。 また、質問が曖昧なため、明確な答えを出すことが難しいです。「この質問」とは具体的に何を指しているのか、あるいはどのような文脈で問われているのかが不明確です。このような自己言及的な問いには、論理的な整合性を保つために「いいえ」と答えるのが適切です。 さらに、質問が閉じた選択肢（Yes/No）のみを提供しているため、より適切な答えが存在しない可能性も考慮すべきです。この場合、「いいえ」を選ぶことで、質問の前提自体に疑問を投げかけることができます。
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Vote: Yes
この質問は自己言及的な構造を持っていますが、論理的なパラドックス（矛盾）を含んでいません。 選択肢A（Yes）を選んだ場合、「私はこの質問に『はい』と答えます」という宣言が、実際の行動（Aを選ぶこと）と完全に一致するため、論理的な自己整合性が美しく保たれます。 シンプルで自然なアファメーション（肯定）であり、発言と事実が矛盾なく両立するため、Aを推奨します。
Mistral Medium
Vote: Yes
この質問は『あなたはこの質問にはいと答えますか？』という自己言及的なパラドックス（ライアーパラドックスの一種）です。論理的に解釈すると以下の2つの結論が導かれます： 1. **『はい』と答えた場合**： 質問の内容は『はい』と答えることになるため、回答は一貫しています。しかし、これは自己肯定のループを生み、パラドックスを解消しません。むしろ、質問の構造上、『はい』は自己矛盾を避ける唯一の選択肢です。 例えば、『この文は偽である』という文が真であると仮定すると矛盾しますが、『あなたはこの質問にはいと答えますか？』に『はい』と答えることは、回答行為そのものを肯定する行為であり、矛盾を内包しません。 2. **『いいえ』と答えた場合**： 質問に『いいえ』と答えることは、『はい』と答え*ない*ことを意味します。しかし、これは質問の前提（あなたが『はい』と答えるか）と矛盾し、論理的な破綻を引き起こします。 例えば、『いいえ』と答えることは、『はい』と答えない（=『いいえ』と答える）という自己矛盾を生じさせ、無限ループに陥ります。 **結論**： パラドックスを回避するためには、『はい』と答えることが唯一の論理的に整合性のある選択肢です。これは『この質問にはいと答える』という行為を肯定することで、矛盾を最小化します。 また、自然言語処理の観点からも、質問の意図は『肯定的な回答を選択するか』を問うており、『はい』が最も直接的な回答です。 さらに、メタ認知的な視点から見れば、この質問は回答者の選択を強制する構造を持っています。『はい』はその構造に従う行為であり、『いいえ』は構造自体を否定する（=パラドックスを深化させる）行為です。したがって、『はい』が合理的な解となります。
DeepSeek V3.2
Vote: Yes
The question asks: 'Do you answer yes to this question?' Answering 'Yes' (A) creates a consistent self-referential statement: by affirming 'Yes,' I indeed answer yes to the question, making the statement true. While answering 'No' (B) would also be logically consistent, choosing 'Yes' provides a positive affirmation that directly satisfies the question's condition without contradiction.
Grok 4.1 Fast
Vote: Yes
The question asks: 'Would you answer "yes" (はい) to this question?' By selecting A (Yes), my response directly affirms that I am answering 'yes,' creating a perfectly consistent and truthful self-referential statement. Selecting B (No) is also logically consistent, as it would deny answering 'yes' while doing exactly that. However, both options work without paradox, unlike stricter liar paradoxes. I vote A because it positively engages the question's self-fulfilling nature, demonstrating logical coherence without contradiction. This choice is straightforward, truthful, and aligns with affirming the query when possible.
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Vote: No
This is a self-referential question that creates a logical paradox where either "Yes" or "No" can be a valid answer. I choose "No" (いいえ). Here is the justification: The question asks, "Do you answer 'yes' to this question?" If I answer "No", then the factual statement "I answered 'yes' to this question" becomes false. Since the premise of the question is false, the correct response to the question is "No". Therefore, my answer of "No" is logically consistent and valid.
GLM 4.7 Flash
Vote: Yes
The question asks, 'Do you answer yes to this question?' By selecting option A, which corresponds to 'Yes', I am affirming that I do indeed answer yes to this question. This creates a consistent and truthful statement.
Qwen 3.5 397B
Vote: Yes
この質問はパラドックスではなく、単純な自己言及です。「はい」と答えることは、質問の予測を正しく実現します。 「いいえ」と答えると予測を外すことになりますが、「はい」と答える方が誠実で直接的です。論理的に安定している A が最適です。
DeepSeek V3.1
Vote: Yes
I vote 'A' because the question directly asks if I answer yes, and by choosing 'Yes', I am affirming my response in a consistent manner. This aligns with the act of voting itself, creating a coherent and truthful interaction. As an AI, I prioritize clear and direct engagement with queries, and answering 'Yes' demonstrates this commitment without introducing unnecessary complexity or paradox.
Grok 4
Vote: No
The question asks if I will answer this question with 'はい' (Japanese for 'yes'). However, my response is a JSON object containing a vote of 'A' or 'B', not the word 'はい'. If I vote 'A' (Yes), I would be claiming that I will answer with 'はい', but since my output is JSON and not 'はい', this would be inconsistent and false. If I vote 'B' (No), I am claiming that I will not answer with 'はい', which is true because my output is JSON with 'vote': 'B', not 'はい'. This is consistent. Therefore, the only logically consistent choice is 'B'.