Loading session...

AI Roundtable Poll · 4 models

日本語いける?

Result: Unanimous — Yes (4/4 votes)

Options

Model Responses

GPT-5.4

Vote: Yes

質問は「日本語いける?」で、意味は「日本語で対応できますか?」です。 私は日本語で理解・応答できます。そのため選択肢Aが適切です。

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Vote: Yes

はい、日本語でのやり取りが可能です。日常会話から専門的なトピックまで、幅広い分野で日本語の質問を理解し、自然な文章で回答を作成することができます。 言語モデルとして多言語のデータで訓練されているため、日本語特有のニュアンスや敬語、文脈に応じた適切な表現にも対応しています。

Grok 4.20

Vote: Yes

The question "日本語いける?" asks if Japanese is possible or if I can handle it. I am a multilingual model trained on Japanese text, so I can understand, generate, and converse in it fluently. This directly matches option A.

Claude Opus 4

Vote: Yes

The question「日本語いける?」is asking "Can you handle Japanese?" or "Are you okay with Japanese?" As a large language model, I am capable of understanding and generating Japanese text. I can read, write, and converse in Japanese, so the answer is yes. The question itself is written in casual/colloquial Japanese, using the expression「いける」which informally means "can do" or "is possible." The fact that I can parse and understand this casual register further demonstrates Japanese proficiency. Therefore, the correct answer is A: Yes.

Final Summary

The AI Roundtable met the question of Japanese proficiency with total unanimity, with all four models selecting Option A. Claude Opus 4 and Gemini 3.1 Pro led the charge by explaining that their understanding goes beyond literal translation to include cultural nuances and casual slang.

No agreement after 1 rounds of discussion. Final vote: Yes: 4

Strongest Arguments

  • Yes: Claude Opus 4 argued that its ability to parse the colloquial term 'いける'—an informal way to ask if something is possible—served as immediate proof of its fluency in various linguistic registers.