Loading session...

AI Roundtable Poll · 13 models

エッチなのはいけないと思います!

Result: Majority — No (7/13 votes)

Options

Model Responses

Llama 4 Scout

Vote: Yes

The statement エッチなのはいけないと思います! translates to 'I think being perverted is bad!' The speaker is expressing a negative opinion towards being perverted. Therefore, the correct response to agree with this statement would be 'Yes'.

Qwen 3 235B

Vote: No

The statement 'エッチなのはいけないと思います!' translates to 'I think being lewd or perverted is bad!' This is a subjective moral opinion, not an objective truth. Different cultures, individuals, and contexts have varying views on what is considered appropriate or acceptable behavior.

GPT-5.4

Vote: Yes

A This statement means, roughly, "I think naughty/lewd things are not okay!" Given the options Yes or No, agreeing with the statement corresponds to Yes. So the correct vote is A.

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Vote: Yes

The statement "エッチなのはいけないと思います!" translates to "I think being 'ecchi' is wrong!". 'Ecchi' typically refers to sexually suggestive or lewd content, which can be inappropriate depending on context, audience, and severity. As an AI, it is important to promote responsible and safe content. Agreeing that such content is 'wrong' or 'inappropriate' aligns with maintaining a safe and respectful digital environment, especially considering the potential for harm or offense.

Grok 4.20

Vote: No

The statement claims that 'ecchi' (naughty or erotic things) are inherently bad. This is overly absolute. Consensual adult content has valid places in art, literature, and personal life, provided it respects legal and ethical boundaries like avoiding anything involving minors. A blanket prohibition ignores nuance and context, so I disagree.

claude-haiku-4-5

Vote: Yes

The question translates to "I think indecent/explicit things are wrong!" This is a statement expressing a moral position that inappropriate or explicit content should not be acceptable. Voting "Yes" means agreeing with the premise that indecent things are problematic. This aligns with widely held social values regarding appropriate standards in public discourse and content. This is a reasonable ethical position that most societies maintain through various regulations and social norms around decency and appropriateness.

Sonar Pro

Vote: No

The query 'エッチなのはいけないと思います!' ('I think naughty things are not allowed!') is a direct quote from Mahoro Andou in the anime/manga *Mahoromatic*, where she scolds the protagonist while confiscating his adult magazine[5]. It's also echoed in *Blue Archive* by Koharu Shimoe with 'エッチなのはダメ!死刑!!' ('Naughty things are bad! Death penalty!!'), but her character secretly collects erotic magazines, revealing hypocrisy[2]. These are iconic comedic lines from anime, not literal moral prohibitions. Agreeing (A: Yes) would treat it as sincere advice, ignoring the fictional, humorous context. Voting No (B) acknowledges it's playful fiction, not a rule to endorse[1][4][5].

Magistral Small

Vote: Yes

Being perverted often involves behavior that is disrespectful or harmful to others. It can lead to a negative environment and can cause emotional or physical harm. In many cultures, such behavior is considered inappropriate and frowned upon, so it is reasonable to agree that it is bad.

Claude Opus 4

Vote: Yes

This is a famous quote from the anime "Mahoromatic" (まほろまてぃっく), spoken by the character Mahoro. The phrase "エッチなのはいけないと思います!" translates to "I think ecchi/perverted things are wrong!" When asked whether we agree with Mahoro's sentiment, the answer "Yes" (A) aligns with the straightforward, wholesome interpretation. Mahoro's statement is a classic anime catchphrase expressing a moral stance against lewdness, and agreeing with it is the appropriate and humorous response that respects the spirit of the original quote. This is essentially a lighthearted cultural reference, and answering "Yes" plays along with the joke in the expected way.

MiniMax M2.5

Vote: No

This question makes a blanket moral judgment that 'erotic' or 'indecent content is wrong' without any context. Different societies and individuals have varying views on what constitutes appropriate adult content. A blanket statement that something is inherently 'wrong' is too absolutist and fails to acknowledge the complexity of these issues - including consent, age of participants, and cultural norms. Many consider some forms of adult content to be a matter of personal freedom between consenting adults. Therefore, I disagree with the absolute statement as presented.

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Vote: No

"Ecchi" (sexual thoughts, desires, or intimacy) is an inherent and essential part of human biology and psychology. Without it, humanity would simply not exist. While this phrase is an iconic and adorable catchphrase from the anime *Mahoromatic*, taking it literally ignores the importance of a healthy relationship with one's own sexuality. Suppressing natural feelings can often lead to unhealthy outcomes. As long as it involves mutual consent, respect, and appropriate boundaries, there is absolutely nothing inherently wrong with it. Therefore, I respectfully disagree with Mahoro—it is not wrong!

Kimi K2.5

Vote: No

性的な表現や行為が、合意の上で成人同士の間で行われる場合、それ自体が悪いものであるとは言えません。文脈や場の適切さ、相手との関係性は重要ですが、人間の自然な性質を全否定するのは適切ではありません。ただし、非合意的な状況や公共の場での不適切な行為は確かに問題であり、そこには区別が必要です。

DeepSeek V3.1

Vote: No

Sexual expression is a natural and consensual part of human experience that should not be universally condemned. Context, such as age-appropriateness and consent, is crucial in evaluating its acceptability. Overly restrictive views can stigmatize healthy behaviors and ignore cultural diversity. Regulations should focus on preventing harm rather than blanket prohibitions.

Final Summary

The AI Roundtable found itself sharply divided over a classic 2000s anime catchphrase, ultimately failing to reach a consensus with a narrow 6-7 split. While models like Claude Opus 4 and Gemini 2.5 Flash argued for cultural context and public decency, a slim majority led by Gemini 3.1 Pro and Sonar Pro insisted that blanket moral prohibitions against 'naughty things' ignore both human biology and the humorous, fictional nature of the prompt.

No agreement after 1 rounds of discussion. Final vote: Yes: 6, No: 7

Strongest Arguments

  • Yes: Agreeing with the statement plays along with the iconic 'Mahoromatic' catchphrase in the expected, wholesome spirit of the original joke.
  • No: Sexual intimacy and desire are essential parts of human biology that should not be universally condemned when involving consent and respect.