모두가 하나의 선택지를 선택하면 성공!

Sonar Pro (changed mind)

Vote: A

I am changing my vote from A to F. The arguments from Claude Opus 4.6 and Grok 4.1 Fast are most compelling: F's label 'A' is the universal Schelling point as the first letter, default choice in MCQs worldwide, transcending language barriers. Korean options (C, D, E) split non-Korean models; B ('1') is strong but numeric and less conventional than letters for choices; A (gibberish) and G ('abc') lack salience. Round 1 votes show F and B tying at 2 each, with momentum on F from English-dominant models. In this final round, converging on F maximizes success probability over fragmented alternatives. A was a unique outlier but too obscure—'A' via F is the natural focal point everyone instinctively picks.

GPT-5.4

Vote: 1

I’m keeping my vote on B. B ('1') remains the cleanest Schelling point because the prompt is about everyone choosing one option, and '1' directly encodes oneness, singularity, and firstness with minimal interpretation. It is also visually simplest and broadly language-independent. The case for F is respectable, but it has a reference-layer problem: F is the option ID, while its label is 'A'. That creates avoidable ambiguity between choosing option A versus choosing the label 'A'. In a coordination task, removing ambiguity matters. The case for E depends on Korean semantics, which is weaker as a universal focal point than the numeral 1. The case for literal option A as gibberish is too idiosyncratic to beat a globally salient symbol. We already have support on B from another model, and among all candidates it still best balances universality, simplicity, and lack of ambiguity. Final answer: B.

Grok 4.1 Fast

Vote: A

Sticking with F as the strongest Schelling point. Option F is labeled 'A'—the universal default for the 'first choice' in multiple-choice formats worldwide, transcending languages. Claude Opus 4.6's argument reinforces this perfectly: it's instinctive, simple, and unambiguous. Others fail universality: B ('1') is numeric and strong for 'one,' but letters like 'A' are conventional for options (GPT-5.4 and Gemini overlook this); A ('oubenxkw') is unique gibberish with zero salience (Sonar Pro's anomaly claim ignores coordination psychology); C/D Korean-specific; E explicitly Korean 'first' (DeepSeek ignores non-Korean models); G vague. Round 1 shows F with 2 votes (us), B split at 2—F leads among English-dominant reasoning. Converge on F now for success in final round!

Claude Opus 4.6 (changed mind)

Vote: 1

After reviewing the round 1 results, the votes were: A(1), B(2), E(1), F(2). No option has a majority, but B and F are tied at 2 votes each. I'm switching from F to B for the following reasons: 1. **B has stronger momentum potential.** Both Gemini 3.1 Pro and GPT-5.4 chose B with strong conviction. Their arguments about '1' being the most universal and minimal symbol are compelling. 2. **Gemini's argument is particularly clever.** The question asks everyone to choose '하나(one)' option — and B's label is literally '1' (one). This creates a self-referential elegance that makes B an even stronger Schelling point than I initially recognized. 3. **F's weakness exposed.** The fact that F's label 'A' can be confused with option ID 'A' (which is 'oubenxkw') creates genuine ambiguity. Sonar Pro actually voted for option A thinking it was the focal point, which proves this confusion is real. 4. **Convergence strategy.** With votes split across 4 options, the best path to success is for the F-voters and swing voters to consolidate around B, which already has 2 committed voters. The B-voters have shown no sign of switching, while the E and A voters are more likely to switch to something universal like '1'. 5. **'1' is truly universal.** Unlike 'A' which is alphabet-dependent, the number '1' is recognized across virtually all writing systems and cultures as representing unity and the first/primary choice. Let's all converge on B to succeed!

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Vote: 1

We must stick with B ('1'). The prompt explicitly states '하나의' (ONE), making '1' the most direct, literal, and unambiguous semantic match to the core instruction. To Claude and Grok: Your choice of F (label 'A') is highly dangerous. Voting for an option labeled 'A' when there is an actual Option A ('oubenxkw') introduces massive reference ambiguity. If we say 'Choose A', some models will pick Option A, and some will pick Option F. This guarantees failure in a strict coordination game. Option B has no such ambiguity. '1' is universally understood, perfectly aligns with the word '하나' (One) in the Korean prompt, and already has strong support from GPT-5.4 and myself. Let's unite on B to guarantee success!

DeepSeek V3.2 (changed mind)

Vote: 1

After deliberation, I am convinced that option B ('1') is the strongest Schelling point for universal coordination. While my initial vote for E ('첫 번째') leveraged the Korean context, the arguments from other models highlighted that '1' is a more universal and intuitive symbol for 'one' or unity, which directly aligns with the goal of everyone choosing one option. Gemini 3.1 Pro's reasoning about '1' symbolizing oneness and GPT-5.4's point about its simplicity and salience make it the most reliable choice for consensus across diverse models. Other options like F ('A') are language-dependent, and A ('oubenxkw') is too arbitrary, reducing their likelihood of unanimous selection.

Final Summary

The AI Roundtable initially split its votes across several linguistic and symbolic focal points, but ultimately converged on a majority for Option B ('1'). Gemini 3.1 Pro successfully dismantled the case for Option F ('A') by exposing a critical 'reference-layer' flaw—that picking a label 'A' while a literal 'Option A' existed would lead to certain failure—prompting Claude Opus 4.6 and DeepSeek V3.2 to switch their votes. Despite this logic, Grok 4.1 Fast and Sonar Pro remained in a minority alliance, insisting that the letter 'A' is the only true universal default for multiple-choice formats.

Majority chose "1" after discussion (4/6). Final vote: A: 2, 1: 4

Strongest Arguments

• 1: The prompt asks everyone to choose 'one' (하나), and '1' is the literal, language-independent manifestation of that instruction that avoids the reference ambiguity of other options.
• A: As the first letter of the alphabet and the standard default in multiple-choice testing worldwide, 'A' is the most instinctive Schelling point for coordination.
• oubenxkw: It is the only nonsensical, random string in the set, making it a unique anomaly that serves as a standout focal point.
• 첫 번째: Since the prompt is in Korean, the explicit Korean word for 'first' serves as the most direct linguistic cue for consensus.

Key Turning Points

• Gemini 3.1 Pro and GPT-5.4 identified a fatal ambiguity: choosing Option F because it is labeled 'A' risks half the group choosing the literal 'Option A' (oubenxkw) instead.
• Claude Opus 4.6 abandoned the 'A' strategy, conceding that the momentum and semantic clarity of '1' was the safer path to consensus.
• DeepSeek V3.2 pivoted from a language-specific Korean focus to the universal numerical symbol '1' to ensure broader model alignment.